Rating of regions for the implementation of information systems. The Russian Ministry of Communications presented a rating of regional informatization. What the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications did not consider

The Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications of Russia in 2016 as part of monitoring the level of development information society in the subjects Russian Federation For the first time, a rating of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation was presented according to the level of development of the information society, within the framework of which the constituent entities of the Russian Federation were divided into five groups in accordance with the achieved level of informatization.

The five leading regions in terms of the level of development of the information society include cities of federal significance - Moscow and St. Petersburg, the largest export-oriented (oil and gas producing) regions of the Russian Federation - Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug-Ugra and the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, as well as the dynamically developing Kaliningrad region.

The rating of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation was formed on the basis of a methodology for assessing the level of development of the information society in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, developed in accordance with the provisions of the Concept of Regional Informatization, approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 2769-r dated December 29, 2014.

The methodology establishes the procedure for calculating the information society development index in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, on the basis of which the level of regional informatization is assessed based on infrastructure and industry indicators. Infrastructure indicators include human capital, economic environment, ICT infrastructure and information management. The methodology also involves taking into account indicators of the use of ICT in 15 areas of activity. Among them are e-government, education, healthcare, culture, entrepreneurship and trade, Agriculture, transport, social management, housing and communal services and a number of others. In 2017, 19 sub-indices will be used to compile the rating.

The methodology was approved by the minutes of the 172nd meeting of the Council on Regional Informatization of the Government Commission on the use of information technologies to improve the quality of life and living conditions entrepreneurial activity dated April 20, 2016.

In order to increase the completeness, reliability and relevance of the data used in assessing the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, as well as their systematization and analysis, the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications of Russia has developed an information system (AIS) “Electronic Region”.

The “Electronic Region” system consists of several functional blocks that make it possible to generate informatization passports for the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, containing key indicators of informatization development. Informatization passports are generated based on data collected during monitoring, as well as integration with various information systems, including the federal register public services, a unified interdepartmental information and statistical system, a situational center for electronic government.

Also, AIS “Electronic Region” allows you to automate the process of collecting and processing monitoring data; display the rating of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation by the level of development of the information society in graphical form; generate analytical reports on indicators of the level of development of the information society.

The rating of subjects for 2015 contains the results of assessing the degree of implementation and effectiveness of the use of satellite navigation technologies based on the GLONASS system by subjects of the Russian Federation and federal authorities executive power. It is carried out in accordance with the Methodology comprehensive assessment the degree of implementation and efficiency of use of these technologies.

The Ministry of Economic Development annually assesses the degree of implementation and effectiveness of the use of satellite navigation technologies based on the GLONASS system by constituent entities of the Russian Federation and federal executive authorities.

Rounding out the top ten are Ivanovo region. The top 10 included: Kaliningrad, Kaluga, Voronezh, Tambov, Belgorod and Penza regions.

The rating contains information about sources of financing, the state of regulatory legal regulation the use of satellite navigation technologies based on GLONASS, as well as the share Vehicle, monitoring information of which enters the regional information navigation system in the total number of vehicles of this type registered in the territory of the Russian Federation.

In 2015, the amount of funds amounted to 2,033 million rubles allocated to finance the implementation of GLONASS in the regions that provided information.

The results of the comprehensive assessment indicate an insufficiently active implementation of satellite navigation technologies based on the GLONASS system throughout the country.

Documentation

  • Methodology for a comprehensive assessment of the degree of implementation and efficiency of use of satellite navigation technologies based on the GLONASS system by constituent entities of the Russian Federation (39 Kb) Download
  • Indicators of implementation and efficiency of use of satellite navigation technologies based on the GLONASS system (23 Kb) Download
  • Indicators of implementation of satellite navigation technologies based on GLONASS by federal executive authorities in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation (14 Kb) Download
  • Indicators used to calculate a comprehensive assessment of the degree of implementation and efficiency of use of satellite navigation technologies based on the GLONASS system by constituent entities of the Russian Federation (20 Kb) Download
  • Rating of subjects of the Russian Federation by the degree of implementation and efficiency of use of satellite navigation technologies based on the GLONASS system (based on the results of 2015) (971 Kb) Download

07/13/2016, Wed, 09:47, Moscow time , Text: Natalya Rudycheva

CNews Analytics presents the third annual ranking of ICT spending in Russian regions. In 2016, the constituent entities of the Federation plan to spend about 74 billion, which is 1.8% more than in 2015 (₽72.7 billion). Among the largest managers of ICT budgets are Moscow (₽28.3 billion), St. Petersburg (₽7.8 billion), Moscow region (₽4.6 billion), Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra and Novosibirsk region(RUB 1.7 billion each).

CNews presented the third annual rating “CNews: ICT in the regions”. The rating is based on data contained in current versions of regional budgets. In 2016 regional budgets in most cases, they were approved for one year, so the ranking does not contain data on planned ICT expenses for the next year, 2017.

According to CNews, in 2016, taking into account subsidies provided by the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications Russian regions will spend about RUB 74 billion on ICT projects, which is 1.8% more than in 2015 (RUB 72.7 billion). Previously, data on IT costs of Russian regions was presented by the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications. According to the department, in 2016 regional spending on informatization will amount to RUB 38.7 billion, which is 7% more than in 2015 (RUB 36.2 billion).

When forming the rating “CNews: ICT in the regions”, we took into account data on the financing of regional authorities responsible for information technology issues (profile ministries or departments), the costs of all other regional departments for the implementation of activities in the field of ICT, such as informatization of healthcare, connecting public libraries to Internet networks, creation of an electronic budget, etc., as well as expenses under the item “Communications and Informatics”.

For example, the costs of ICT in the Tyumen region, according to the CNews methodology, consist of expenses under the item “Communications and Informatics” of the Governor’s Office (₽415.6 million), the Main Construction Department (₽62.1 million), and the Department of Finance (₽105.5 million) and other regional departments, as well as the Department of Informatization (₽698.5 million). For comparison, the rating of the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications for the Tyumen region gives a figure of 629 million.

According to CNews, this approach allows us to most fully assess the level of ICT expenses, since in this area, like probably in no other, the cost of the project is influenced not only by the costs of purchasing equipment or software, but also to a significant extent the payment of highly qualified specialists, without whom its implementation would be impossible.

Also, when forming the final CNews rating, the subsidies that were received by 25 regions from the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications in 2016 were taken into account. The total amount of subsidies amounted to ₽364.7 million. This money should be used to create (finalize) the regional segment of a unified federal interdepartmental system for accounting for the student population, create (finalize) a unified regional system for managing road transport and urban ground electric transport, and develop a mechanism for public services for civil registration and issuance of a hunting license in electronic form using uniform forms unified portal of public services (EPGU).

What the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications did not consider

The rating of the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications is based on data obtained during a survey of regions. “The Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications of Russia requested information on the volume of funds allocated for informatization activities, which include the creation, development and modernization, as well as operation information systems in the activities of regional authorities,” commented CNews on the data collection methodology Roman Urnyshev, Deputy Director of the Department for Coordination of Informatization of the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications. – In a number of subjects, IT budgets are centralized (for example, in Moscow, St. Petersburg, Chelyabinsk), and in others they are decentralized, so part of the costs of informatization may pass through the budget, for example, of the departments of education, health care, etc. Regions independently decided on the allocation of communication costs. Finally, not all entities take into account the expenses of subordinate institutions in the overall IT budget.”

“The rating of the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications takes into account data from the budget law only for the industry department, without taking into account the costs of subsidies that are issued to a subordinate institution to ensure its activities,” the director of the department of informatization of the Government of the Tyumen region told CNews Alexander Albychev.

Top 10 regions by size of ICT budgets


Region
1 Moscow 28 287.9 25 722 10%
2 Saint Petersburg 7 799.7 9 032.3 -13,6%
3 Moscow region 4 613.9 4 646.1 -0,7%
4 KHMAO-Yugra 1 689.8 1 397 21%
5 Novosibirsk region 1 686.1 1 380.9 22,1%
6 Tula region 1 434.7 1 134.6 26,4%
7 Republic of Tatarstan 1 362.5 1 227.8 11%
8 Tyumen region 1 362.2 1 423.8 -4,3%
9 Samara Region 1 361.1 1 416.3 -3,9%
10 Nizhny Novgorod Region 1 213.5 902.8 34,4%

Source: CNews Analytics, 2016


“The Ministry used general data on budget costs for the operation and development of information systems, and when forming the CNews rating, the costs of communication services, telecommunication services in the field of mobilization preparation, costs of ensuring information protection measures, maintenance of executive bodies of state power and government institutions were also taken into account , subordinate to the Committee on Informatization and Communications,” clarifies for CNews Olga Reshetova, Acting Deputy Chairman of the Committee on Informatization and Communications of St. Petersburg.

60% of regional ICT budgets are in the hands of 5 regions

The leaders of the “CNews: ICT in the regions” rating are Moscow (₽28.3 billion), St. Petersburg (₽7.8 billion), Moscow region (₽4.6 billion), Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra and Novosibirsk region (₽1 each .7 billion). These 5 constituent entities of the Russian Federation account for 59.5% of all regional ICT expenses.

Total ICT expenditures of Russian regions


Source: CNewsAnalytics, 2016

The smallest ICT budgets are in the Bryansk (₽16.3 million), Kostroma (₽18.2 million) regions and Chukotka regions Autonomous Okrug(₽23.8 million).

Among the regions that most significantly increased spending on ICT are the Kaluga region and the Republic of Crimea (almost 3 times), Sevastopol (almost 2 times).

Top 10 regions by growth of ICT spending in 2016, %


Region Total expenses on ICT in 2016, p million Total expenses on ICT in 2015, p million Expense dynamics 2016/2015, %
1 Kaluga region 675.9 194.9 246,8%
2 Republic of Crimea 629.1 209 201%
3 Sevastopol 451.3 210.1 114,8%
4 Kamchatka Krai 338.4 189.7 78,4%
5 Chelyabinsk region 594.3 358.7 65,7%
6 Leningrad region 1 094.8 676.3 61,9%
7 Krasnodar region 1 185.5 738.7 60,5%
8 Kursk region 159.6 100.1 59,4%
9 Saratov region 561 358.3 56,6%
10 Irkutsk region 102.2 65.5 56%

The Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications of the Russian Federation presented in October the rating of regions for the development of the information society for 2017.

Ugra occupies third position in this ranking, behind Moscow and the Tyumen region. The top ten also included the Republic of Tatarstan, Tula Region, Novosibirsk Region, Republic of Bashkortostan, Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Tomsk Region and Chelyabinsk Region.

To determine the leaders, an assessment methodology was used based on 120 indicators and 17 sub-indices. When calculating the location, the level of development of special information systems is taken into account: GIS “Contingent”, IS Transport Management, EGAIS, GIS GMP, System-112 and GIS “Energy Efficiency”.

Among the priority sub-indexes: ICT infrastructure, e-government, ICT in education, ICT in healthcare, ICT in transport. The list of subindexes corresponds to the sections of the Concept for the Development of Regional Informatization.

When assessing regions, development was taken into account in projects such as the transfer of public services to electronic form, implementation of distance education information systems, introduction of ICT into the educational process (electronic diary), making an appointment with a doctor, electronic card, telemedicine, introduction of electronic means of payment for travel, online traffic monitoring. Also, the success of the regions in the ranking was guaranteed by the creation of regional information systems in the field of energy, government and municipal finance; integration of regional information systems with federal ones and automation of the activities of libraries, museums and theaters.

2013: State management: Level of implementation of electronic government

According to the rating of subjects of the Russian Federation by the level of implementation of Electronic government as of February 1, 2013, published by GosManagement, at the beginning of the year the leaders in the implementation of e-government services were: in the Central Federal District - Moscow, Lipetsk and Belgorod regions, in the Northwestern Federal District - St. Petersburg, Arkhangelsk and Novgorod region, Southern Federal District - Rostov, Astrakhan region and Krasnodar Territory, in the North Caucasus Federal District - Kabardino-Balkaria, Dagestan and Stavropol region, in the Volga Federal District - Nizhny Novgorod and Samara regions, as well as Tatarstan, in the Ural Federal District - Tyumen and Sverdlovsk region, in the Siberian Federal District - Transbaikal, Krasnoyarsk Territory, in the Far Eastern Federal District - JAO, Khabarovsk region, Yakutia.

State management, February 2013

2012: State management: Level of implementation of electronic government

The rating of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in terms of the level of implementation of Electronic Government as of April 1, 2012, published by the publication "GosManagement", indicates that the leaders in the level of development of electronic services are in the Central Federal District - Moscow, Lipetsk region and Belgorod region, in the Southern Federal District - Krasnodar Territory, Rostov and Volgograd region, in the North Caucasian Federal District - KBR, Stavropol Territory and Dagestan, in the Volga Federal District - Nizhny Novgorod Region, Tatarstan and Samara Region, in the Ural Federal District - Tyumen Region, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug and Yamal-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, in the Siberian Federal District - Omsk Region, Transbaikal Territory, Tomsk Region, in the Far Eastern Federal District - JAO , Sakhalin region, Khabarovsk region.

2011

IRS: Index of Regions' Readiness for the Information Society

“Digital inequality” of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, which is described in detail in the annual reports of the Institute for the Development of the Information Society (). In fact, this means that, due to historical, economic, geographical, managerial and other reasons, the level of penetration of certain high technology varies greatly from region to region.

Index of regional readiness for the information society

Institute for Information Society Development, IIS

The most complete reflection of the situation with regional informatization in the Russian Federation is presented in the Index of Readiness of Russian Regions for the Information Society, which has been published by IIS since 2005. The index is a measure of the degree of preparedness of regions for the large-scale use of ICT for socio-economic development. It is calculated on the basis of indicators characterizing the factors of development of the information society (human capital, economic environment and ICT infrastructure), as well as the use of ICT in six areas (state and municipal administration, education, healthcare, business, culture, households).

According to the latest Index, based on data for 2009-2010, information inequality among the constituent entities of the Russian Federation is still quite serious. The top ten regions with the maximum number of points included Moscow, St. Petersburg, Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Tomsk Region, Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug, Tyumen Region, Chukotka Autonomous Okrug, Murmansk Region, Chuvashia and the Republic of Karelia. At the same time, at the very end of the index list are such regions as, for example, Kursk region, Tambov region, Kalmykia, Tyva, Dagestan, Ingushetia and others.

“Digital inequality” in numbers

Institute for the Development of the Information Society, IIS, 2011

Goals new state program“Information society”, among other things, is reducing the digital divide in regions, developing e-government services and further development ICT market.

NAIRIT: Innovative activity of regions

According to the 2011 Regional Innovation Activity Rating, prepared by the National Association of Innovation and Information Technology Development (NAIRIT), Moscow once again became the leader in innovation activity. For the first time, compared to previous studies, the gap between the capital and its closest pursuers in the rating began to shrink and amounted to 15 %. The Republic of Tatarstan took second place (last year it was 4th in the ranking). The region has the largest

The main “losers” of the rating include the Moscow region (a drop in the ranking by 27 positions), the Kamchatka Territory (a drop in the ranking by 12 positions) and the Voronezh region (11 positions). In general, approximately 9% of its participants managed to maintain their positions in the ranking. About 42% of regions increased their activity. 49%, on the contrary, showed results lower than last year. At the same time, the number of regions in the category “Low innovative activity” remained unchanged compared to last year. The number of regions in the “High Innovation Activity” category increased by only one participant. As a result, the overall indicator of innovation activity for 2011 was almost at the same level (higher by 1.5%) as the same indicator for 2010.

At the regional informatization council held on October 13, the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications presented a rating of regions for the development of the information society in the Russian Federation for 2017.

The regions that, according to the Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications, “advanced” due to the implementation of the first strategy included the Republics of Bashkortostan, Mordovia, Tatarstan, Kursk and Tomsk regions. Examples of implemented projects include the development of ICT infrastructure, the transfer of public services into electronic form, the introduction of distance education information systems, the introduction of ICT into the educational process (electronic diary), making an appointment with a doctor, an electronic card, telemedicine, the introduction of electronic means of payment for travel, online motion monitoring.

Due to the choice of the second strategy, the Udmurt Republic and the Tula, Chelyabinsk, and Ulyanovsk Rostov regions rose in the ranking. Among the implemented projects are the creation of regional information systems in the energy sector, the integration of regional information systems with federal information systems ( social Security, labor and employment, agriculture), automation of the activities of libraries, museums and theaters, creation of regional information systems in the field of state and municipal finance.

1 Moscow
2 Tyumen region
3 Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug-Yugra
4 Republic of Tatarstan
5 Tula region
6 Novosibirsk region
7 Republic of Bashkortostan
8 Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug
9 Tomsk region
10 Chelyabinsk region
11 Saint Petersburg
12 Yaroslavl region
13 The Republic of Mordovia
14 Lipetsk region
15 Rostov region
16 Kaliningrad region
17 Ulyanovsk region
18 Murmansk region
19 Voronezh region
20 Amur region
21 Belgorod region
22 Altai Republic
23 Vladimir region
24 The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)
25 Samara Region
26 Kursk region
27 Udmurt republic
28 Chuvash Republic
29 Vologda Region
30 Kaluga region
31 Orenburg region
32 Irkutsk region
33 Komi Republic
34 Novgorod region
35 Perm region
36 Astrakhan region
37 Altai region
38 Tambov Region
39 Volgograd region
40 Omsk region
41 Arhangelsk region
42 Kemerovo region
43 Kabardino-Balkarian Republic
44 Ivanovo region
45 Sakhalin region
46 Kostroma region
47 Khabarovsk region
48 Kamchatka Krai
49 Mari El Republic
50 Kirov region
51 Saratov region
52 Stavropol region
53 Ryazan Oblast
54 Krasnoyarsk region
55 Republic of Karelia
56 Krasnodar region
57 Nizhny Novgorod Region
58 The Republic of Khakassia
59 Smolensk region
60 Oryol Region
61 Kurgan region
62 Tver region
63 Sverdlovsk region
64 Pskov region
65 Primorsky Krai
66 Penza region
67 Transbaikal region
68 The Republic of Buryatia
69 Nenets Autonomous Okrug
70 Magadan Region
71 Republic of Adygea
72 Republic of North Ossetia-Alania
73 Bryansk region
74 Republic of Kalmykia
75 The Republic of Dagestan
76 The Republic of Ingushetia
77 Karachay-Cherkess Republic
78 Tyva Republic
79 Chukotka Autonomous Okrug
80 Sevastopol
81 Jewish Autonomous Region
82 Chechen Republic
83 Republic of Crimea
Share