Investment policy. Regional investment policy Main aspects of regional investment policy

Regional investment policy is a strategic plan of action in the investment market of the region. It has goals and priorities - strategic and immediate directions and a system of interrelated measures to regulate the regional investment market. The goals and priorities of investment policy are determined by development goals of this region. In accordance with them, the priority areas of activity of regional authorities in the investment market in the role of a borrower investor or institutional investor and methods of regulation are considered.

One of the instruments of regional investment policy aimed at improving investment climate, advocates legislative activity.

In recent years, the emphasis in the legal regulation of investment activities has shifted to the regional level. In an increasing number of regions of Russia, local administrations are actively working to stimulate and support investment activity. This is due to the strengthening role of the constituent entities of the Federation in the economic and legal spheres, the urgent need of the regions for investment resources and the lack of a sufficiently clear state strategy for attracting private investment into the domestic economy. A group of regions is gradually emerging - leaders in the field of formation of investment culture and organization of the investment process.

Legal regulation of investment activities at the regional level is carried out in a number of areas Litvinenko V.A. Directions and methods of intensifying state investment policy in the regions of Russia // Audit and financial analysis. - 2008. - No. 6.:

  • 1. Issues of socio-economic development of the region - identification of priority sectors of the economy and priority enterprises. About a third of the regions have identified priority activities for investment. The detail of the development of priority areas varies from fairly general provisions (“industry and agriculture” in the Voronezh region) to more detailed ones, for example, the production of paper and cardboard and products made from them in the Penza region.
  • 2. Formation of investment openness and attractiveness of regions, their investment image, including through the cultural compilation of enterprise catalogs, catalogs of investment projects, etc. The Republics of Tatarstan, Komi, and the Yaroslavl region stand out here.
  • 3. Development and adoption of targeted investment programs in the region to create import-substituting industries, to increase the competitiveness of individual industries and individual facilities.
  • 4. Active activities to attract foreign investment. It is characteristic that while the country’s overall attractiveness for foreign investors is still low, there are regions in which this attractiveness is comparable to European countries. The leaders in this regard include Nizhny Novgorod and the Nizhny Novgorod region, the Orenburg region, and the Komi Republic. Work is being carried out actively and effectively to attract foreign investment in the Novgorod region. Next come the regions of the Central Black Earth Region and the Volga region, where with government support it is possible to quickly increase investment attractiveness for foreign capital.
  • 5. Organizational issues - the procedure for registering enterprises with foreign investment, licensing, creation of special structures in government bodies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, directly implementing programs to support and attract investments.
  • 6. Issues of benefits and privileges - providing and ensuring guarantees of investor rights; creation of a preferential regime for investment activities (exemptions on taxes and fees, provision of investment tax credits). The most common types of tax incentives to stimulate investment were income tax (33 entities) and property tax (28 entities). Different entities use different mechanisms for providing tax benefits, for example:
    • - for all investment projects (Kaluga, Tomsk, Belgorod, Tver and other regions);
    • - investment projects for priority areas development (Yaroslavl and Rostov regions, Republic of Ingushetia, etc.);
    • - organizations created with the participation of foreign capital (Republic of Mordovia).
  • 7. Issues of accelerated depreciation; preferential terms land use; preferential rental rates for real estate, for the use of subsoil, natural resources. For example, regarding the size rent for land the best solutions are:
    • - Kaliningrad region, where the procedure and basic formula for calculating the amount of rent depending on the category of land are determined;
    • - Republic of Tatarstan, where the rent is fixed at 1.5%;
    • - Nizhny Novgorod and Ulyanovsk regions, where exemption from rent is practiced in terms of payments credited to the regional budget for investment projects.
  • 8. Preparation practice work force according to orders from entrepreneurs. For an investor, training is always associated with time and high costs, especially at the early stage of organizing a business. The role of supplier of personnel for business should be assumed by the authorities forming the education system in the region. Thus, in the Leningrad region, a catalog of regional organizations is maintained that provide training and advanced training for workers and specialists. In general, only in two regions were government proposals revealed about their readiness to take on some of the tasks of preparing labor resources for investment projects. These are the Rostov and Samara regions.
  • 9. Direct participation of the constituent entities of the Federation in the financing of investment projects, provision of investment loans on preferential terms from the budgets of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and local budgets (as, for example, in the Republic of Karelia, Pskov, Samara regions); release of regional valuable papers; creation of target investment funds, provision of state guarantees of the constituent entities of the Federation to ensure the fulfillment of obligations by investors; creation of a collateral fund for the subjects of the Federation. Thus, collateral funds have been created in five regions, the activities of which open up the possibility of providing state guarantees from the constituent entities of the federation. There is a reinsurance company in the Komi Republic. Of particular importance is increasing the level of economic justification for investment projects based on the standards laid down in modern, generally accepted methods in the world, as well as the selection of criteria for selecting these projects, taking into account the priority tasks of regional development. To increase the level of elaboration of programs, it is important to involve banks in this activity. It is also promising to draw up a so-called investment passport of the region, containing information necessary for potential investors.

System of forms and methods government regulation investment activity at the regional level is presented in Appendix 1.

The practice of investment activities in the regions largely depends on how organically the federal and regional legislation in this area are linked. An analysis of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and federal laws in the field of investment shows that on issues financial regulation and civil law relations in the investment process, powers, including law-making, belong mainly to the Russian Federation, while the regions carry out law enforcement practice.

In general, it can be argued that at the regional level these and other specific issues of stimulating investment are being worked out better than at the federal level, which indicates that the authorities are interested in the influx of capital. In a short period of time, many regions of the Russian Federation have formed a more integral and consistent investment policy than at the federal level. However, there is no qualitative change: there is no large-scale influx of investment, despite the fact that a rather intense struggle is developing between regions for investors by providing more and more benefits, guarantees, etc.

Practice shows: for entrepreneurs investing in Russian regions, more important than the specific benefits and regional guarantees provided, are the general stability of legal and economic conditions for the country, the transparency of economic processes, which decisively determine the reliability of investments.

Without combining the efforts of federal, regional and local authorities, the public and alternative sectors of the economy, it is difficult to count on the transition of the economy to the stage of sustainable economic growth.

UDC 332.63

INVESTMENT POLICY IN THE REGION AND TOOLS FOR ITS IMPLEMENTATION

J.B. Vorobyova

Investment policy in the region is proposed as the main element economic policy carried out by the state and business entities with the establishment of the structure and scale of investments, directions of their use, sources of receipt, taking into account the need to solve socio-economic problems.

Key words: investment policy, economic policy, region, economic entity, solutions to socio-economic problems, tools, economic mechanism, investment activity.

The effective development and functioning of regions largely depends not only on all types of resources available to them - production, labor, financial, natural, innovative, but also on their rational use and the implementation of a sound investment policy. The latter should include managing the distribution of investment resources in the region to obtain the maximum possible result from investment potential region.

It should be noted that in general, investment policy is the main element of economic policy pursued by the state and business entities with the establishment of the structure and scale of investments, directions of their use, sources of receipt, taking into account the need to solve socio-economic problems.

Researchers, practitioners, and managers emphasize that regional investment policy is still at the stage of formation from the point of view of the unambiguous definition of its essence, mechanism, formation, and implementation. In our opinion, there are definitions of essence in a narrow and broader sense. An example of a more complete definition of this concept is the following: “Regional investment policy is a system of targets, institutions, mechanisms and tools that determine the direction of investments and investment decisions, which, in the conditions of market relations, are aimed at ensuring targeted environmental, social and economic development of regions and their internal economic entities in the mode of expanded reproduction, subject to an increase in the share of private and external investments, as well as funds of joint stock savings in their national facility.” This is too broad an interpretation of this concept, which includes the goals and objectives of investment policy.

There are also more laconic formulations of this concept: “Regional investment policy should be understood as a system of measures and a mechanism for their implementation aimed at stimulating investment activity and creating a favorable investment climate in the region.” In our opinion, the most suitable option for determining the essence of the category under consideration can be taken as follows:

Regional investment policy is a set of measures to regulate and stimulate investment activity in the region and a mechanism for their implementation in order to ensure sustainable socio-economic development of the region.

Regional investment policy is developed and implemented through cooperation government agencies federal and regional authorities, as well as local governments.

The investment policy of a region is also a set of decisions systematically taken by the authorities of a constituent entity of the Federation regarding the directions, forms and methods of developing investment processes in the region within the framework of the overall strategy of regional socio-economic development.

Investment policy in each region has its own characteristics, which are determined by the following factors:

The general strategy of socio-economic development carried out in the region;

The size of the available resource potential;

Geographical location;

Investment climate of the region, etc.

Comprehensive information for the development and timely adjustment of regional investment policies can be obtained by conducting a study of the investment climate of a given territory relative to other regions of the Russian Federation, studying trends in changes in individual components investment attractiveness. The state of the investment climate in the region is at the same time an indicator of the success of the investment policy pursued there.

The main objectives of investment policy in the region are the creation of investment market infrastructure; determining priority areas for investment; creating conditions for attracting extra-budgetary sources of investment financing; ensuring integration of the regional investment market with the international market for investment resources.

An important role in boosting the region’s economy and increasing production efficiency is played by sectoral investment policy, developed at the level of individual inter-industry complexes and industries

economy. The task of sectoral investment policy: selection and investment support of priority sectors of the economy.

Regional investment policy is formed in accordance with such principles as focus, validity, integrity, priority, resource balance, vertical and horizontal balance of interests, flexibility, consistency, legal constancy, and effectiveness.

The developed and adopted investment policy can only be implemented taking into account a clear mechanism for its implementation, which should include:

1. Development of the concept of investment policy, selection of strategic guidelines and development priorities investment sphere, as well as regulatory instruments.

2. Creation of the necessary regulatory framework for the functioning of the investment market.

3. Determination of the powers and procedure for interaction of management bodies in the field of investment regulation.

4. Formation of investment market infrastructure.

5. Monitoring the implementation of investment policy.

Investment policy in the region can be implemented directly when it comes to distribution budget funds, which are under the control and disposal of the administration, and indirectly, when it is necessary to direct extra-budgetary investments into a certain direction, which the administration does not control, but can, with the help of special techniques and actions, achieve their desired use.

Schematically, investment policy can be represented as a certain set of realized opportunities and their subsequent results (Fig. 1).

According to the presented investment scheme, i.e. available investment opportunities and subsequent investment flows generally consist of:

Budget funds;

Extrabudgetary funds:

Own capital;

Attracted (borrowed) capital;

Foreign capital;

Sponsorship donations.

Each investment flow goes into an investment process that is implemented along predetermined directions, which are determined based on the developed concept of the region’s development, taking into account the necessary prospects for the formation of its production structure and infrastructure, as well as the possible ideal of the everyday state to which one should strive.

Fig. 1. Systematic approach to the formation of investment

regional politics

In accordance with the accepted concept of regional development, investments can be used as follows: by sectors of the economy that need to be developed; by types of enterprise reproduction; for regions and administrative units lagging behind in their development; on production results (scientific research, mastering the production of new product models, improving its quality, saving production resources, increasing labor productivity, etc.); by payback period and level of investment efficiency (short-term, medium-term and long-term payback).

The choice of direction for using investments and their implementation ends with determining the effectiveness of these investments. It is considered from the standpoint of obtaining a specific economic effect, a social effect that is a consequence of the economic effect and makes up a certain share of it, and a budgetary effect. All three components of the overall effect create specific conditions for the development of the region and through feedback increase its investment opportunities at the new temporary and production stage.

The question of which direction to use investments should be decided on the basis of the accepted concept of regional development. As part of the concept, the following key points must be specified:

Selection of priority areas;

Methods for distributing investment resources (by economic sectors, by regions or administrative units, by types of reproduction, by production results, by payback periods)

The pace of development of the region, the situation of workers, employment of the population and its standard of living depend on the answer to these questions.

Of course, projects with the highest efficiency should be accepted for implementation. This means that the selection of projects for investment should be focused on achieving the best production (including, of course, economics and finance) results; final selection from those allocated best projects on this basis is carried out according to the indicator of the payback period of costs. And this approach should be elevated to the rank of a principle of regional investment.

This principle can be put into practice only through the distribution of free investment resources based on the competitive selection of projects intended for implementation within a given region.

The regional administration can influence business structures in order to develop regions in a given direction, using a fairly large arsenal of various means, levers and instruments, without resorting to command and administrative measures of influence. Their list and structure are presented in Fig. 2.

The entire arsenal of levers and management tools can be divided into two parts: direct action and indirect action through the Federal services.

Direct action tools include:

Regional (republican, regional, regional or municipal) order for the production of the required products;

Preferential taxation of production of products needed by the region;

Preferential lending and interest-free loans for manufacturers of products needed by the region;

Guarantees from the regional administration to credit institutions regarding the return of loans issued to investors;

Subsidies to investors due to the temporary unprofitability of producing products needed by the region;

Price compensation for investor products needed by the regional administration;

Accelerated depreciation of fixed production assets, providing the investor with a reduction in taxes on balance sheet profit;

Expertise and licensing of investor activities in which the regional administration is interested;

Conducting project competitions and bidding for the right to produce products needed for the region;

Antimonopoly policy allowing production development

products needed by the region, curb the appetites of monopolists and create a favorable business field;

Expansion of leasing activities, creating favorable conditions for investment in the production of technically complex products;

Restructuring of debts and payments, allowing enterprises to continue their activities and produce products necessary for the region, save investments and direct them to create new jobs;

Development and expansion of consulting activities and training of enterprise employees in order to improve their skills and rational use of investment resources;

Reasonable conduct and use of bankruptcy procedures to improve the activities of enterprises and include them in social production;

Preferential regional legislation that creates a favorable legal framework for investment and production of products needed by the region.

Fig.2. Levers and tools for regulating investment

activities in the region

In addition to direct instruments for regulating investment activity, it is possible and necessary to use levers and instruments of indirect action, which include: price limits;

restrictions on certain types of products; customs tariffs on export-import products; lobbying the interests of the region in the State Duma; government investments and leasing payments; state budget policy.

The use of individual tools and their reasonable combination will make it possible to direct investment activity in the right direction for the region.

Expanding investments in the economy of a particular region will increase its production and economic potential, increase business activity within this subject of the Federation, contribute to the growth of collected taxes, increase the number of jobs, ensure increased employment, reduce social tension in the region, and maintain at a higher level social sphere- pay on time and at a higher level wages workers and employees of enterprises and public sector employees, pay pensions, provide material support to the disabled, low-income families, etc. It follows that everyone benefits from the development and expansion of investment in the manufacturing sector. But the investments themselves and the management of investment processes are carried out directly locally, in the regions, and the more justified and more effective these processes are, the higher the return on investments made will be, the sooner positive changes will occur in the development of the regional economy, the more tangible the results of these changes will be .

This is why the investment process within the region must be managed and managed competently, highly professionally and efficiently, and for this it is necessary to have a system of evaluation indicators for the results of managing regional investment policy, as well as a criterion for making decisions in the field of priority investment of business activity.

The regional administration creates conditions for investment by establishing certain benefits for specific investors who solve problems necessary for the region. By ensuring priorities in lending to entrepreneurs, the administration can indirectly and quite effectively manage the flow of investment.

In addition, the regional administration has, although not significant, investment opportunities consisting of sponsorship donations, assistance from foreign partners, and part of deductions from taxes collected, reserve insurance funds, issued regional loans, municipal production and commercial activities of enterprises, etc.

Therefore, successful investment activity in the region depends to a large extent on its administration, which means it should be monitored, assessed and analyzed in order to more effectively manage its final results. The first and most important question is

which must be resolved is the question of the criteria for making management decisions for each specific business case and for their entirety in a given unit of time (usually a year) in a given specific region as a whole.

The amount of tax collection cannot be accepted as a criterion for assessing the effectiveness of investment activity on a regional scale, since tax collection can increase even if business investment activity deteriorates when a change occurs tax legislation towards strengthening fiscal policy.

Among other things, it is possible to increase tax collection through the development of antisocial business activity, for example, through the development of the production of alcoholic beverages, the legalization of the activities of drug criminal structures, the expansion and legalization of prostitution, an increase in the gambling business, etc.

The only correct criterion for assessing the effectiveness of investment activity on a regional scale can be one that is derived from the decision-making criterion of a system at a higher hierarchical level. The system for this is the national economy, and its development criterion is the gross domestic product. Thus, in order to ensure the necessary continuity during the transition from the highest to the lowest level of management, to ensure end-to-end and adequate management decision-making in the regions, it is necessary at this level to have a derived criterion from the gross domestic product national economy. Such a criterion could be the increase in the gross domestic product of the region, if the increase in the gross domestic product per capita of the given region is taken as the desired criterion:

A VPR/Chsr ^ max,

where A GDP is the increase in gross regional product per unit of time, year; Chsr is the average annual population in the region.

In addition to the specified criterion, for more effective management and targeted decision-making, taking into account regional characteristics and reflected in regional legislation, restrictions on various resources and the results obtained must be formulated. One of the most important limitations in decision-making is the ratio of the increase in gross regional product over the year to the investment investments that caused it, i.e.

A VPR / A I > 1,

where A GDP is the increase in gross regional product per unit of time, year; AI is the increase in investment in the regional economy in the same year.

In dynamics, the regional administration must constantly and annually monitor changes in the most important social indicators of population development: employment of the working population; average total per capita income; average total and living space per capita; average annual infant mortality rate; average duration the lives of men and women; consumer basket price index; number of active telephones per family; the share of food expenses in the total income of the population; number of workplaces put into operation; growth in officially recorded cash savings per capita; growth in trade turnover per capita; changes in the standard of living of the population; changes in the system of environmental indicators.

There are dozens, even hundreds of different social indicators of population development that the regional administration must constantly determine and monitor, creating a favorable environment for more effective investment management. Only in this case will it be possible to talk about the high and effective policy of the administration, aimed at significantly improving the standard of living of the population, only then the results of the decisions made will be tangible and measurable quantitatively.

Regional development in Russia is quite complex and contradictory, as discussed above; the country's socio-economic development strategy has identified the redistribution of economic rights and powers in favor of the regions as the main vector.

Changes in socio-economic economic conditions have determined new approaches to assessing the investment potential of regions. This requires analysis, monitoring and development of ways to solve problems associated with the investment market infrastructure environment, which involves the creation of a diversified system of investors. It consists of agents of various functional and socio-economic structures - production, intermediary, exchange, investment and other enterprises.

A network of private institutional investors has not yet developed in the regions. The main potential private institutional investors are commercial banks. They carry out primarily short-term lending for the most profitable trade and intermediary operations, rather than investing.

The economy of a country where a domestic investor does not want to invest in the development of production cannot be attractive to a foreign investor. Attracting foreign investment should be carried out taking into account the goals and objectives government programs structural restructuring of the economy, targeted programs of intersectoral and sectoral development, conversion and development of export potential. The processes of internal and external co-operation should also be taken into account.

operations of production and technical products, privatization of state enterprises with the involvement of foreign capital. Regions have the opportunity to change their position as a buyer of investments due to their diversification, receiving foreign investments in the form of technological equipment, components, materials, intellectual property rights, know-how, trademarks, etc. The feasibility of this approach is confirmed not only by a number of foreign experts, but and individual countries, for example, Japan, which purchased and used foreign licenses. This greatly contributed to the successful socio-economic development of the country.

When implementing large-scale innovation and investment projects, an important role is assigned to the long-term lending fund - the innovation and investment fund. It is also advisable to create funds in the regions in order to use their funds for the needs of the development of priority sectors.

The investment policy of the region is built taking into account its specific factors. When conducting it, they try to use the existing advantages to attract investors, both domestic and foreign.

Some regions are counting on increased subsidies from the Federal budget for the development of leading industries, agriculture, and construction. Others are trying to mobilize own resources through local taxes, tax breaks and other channels, others contribute to the development of business in the region in order to obtain its financial resources in the form of investments.

It should be noted that tax incentives as a means of stimulating investment in the region have both positive and negative sides. With a decrease in tax rates and a decrease in the tax base, the processes of investing enterprise profits are stimulated, and the investment activity of the latter increases. However, on the other hand, there is a decrease in the flow of funds to the federal and local budgets. This reduces the possibility of investing in social programs.

Of particular interest is the use of an investment loan, which represents a reduction in the amount of tax by an amount determined as a percentage of the cost of purchased machinery and equipment. The investment loan rate depends on the service life of the equipment and is 2-10% of the total amount of funds invested in the active part of the fixed capital.

A similar role in stimulating investment is played by the system of payments for economic resources - fixed and working capital, natural, production, labor, financial and currency resources.

According to current legislation, existing payments do not always have a direct impact on investment

activity economic entities. By their nature, taxes and payments in investment have the same purpose and can be combined into one subsystem. In terms of financing investments in environmental facilities, payments for natural resources and their protection are insignificant. For example, water fees, weight income, subsoil fees, and rent payments account for about 1% of income in the consolidated local budget.

Price system in market economy is its main regulator. An increase in prices for investment goods and capital structures sufficiently reduces investment activity and demand for investment. This, in turn, encourages investors to invest in other areas of activity not related to investing. In this regard, a decrease in prices for investment goods increases the demand for investment and increases supply from investors, although it negatively affects the interests of producers of investment goods. In general, investment activity is intensified by downward trends in prices for capital construction.

Among the elements of the economic mechanism for activating investment, an important place is occupied by the system of incentives, which is considered as a complex system of measures that provide positive motivation for all participants in the investment process in achieving a compromise in realizing their own and public goals. The system includes incentive areas, objects, areas, tools and incentive methods. The directions include the first - accumulation Money intended to finance investments, the second is the search for projects and proposals for their most effective use. The objects of stimulation are investors, issuers, investment institutions, the investment environment, and infrastructure.

Incentives can be carried out in the field of financing, lending, taxation, pricing, insurance. Incentive tools - benefits, privileges, interest, sanctions. Stimulation methods include various methods of influencing objects in various directions and areas. The above classification of elements of the incentive system allows us to systematize and analyze the effectiveness of the methods used to enhance investment activity, as well as propose more advanced methods and forms of incentives.

As part of the directions for stimulating investment in the regions, specific measures are being developed. So, for example, to stimulate the use of own funds for investment purposes in order to organize and develop the production of highly efficient, competitive machines and equipment by enterprises, as emphasized

above, an accelerated depreciation mechanism can be used, but not more than twice.

To attract federal funds to finance regional programs, it is proposed to place centralized investment resources on a competitive basis based on the use of the indicator financial stability project. In order to attract free cash savings of the population of the regions, it is proposed as investments: the creation of mutual investment funds with the placement of securities among the population; advance payment for housing under construction; distribution of regional loan bonds, etc.

A number of regions of the Russian Federation have developed their own measures to intensify investment processes. For example, in the Komi Republic, income taxes have been reduced by 50% for legal entities creating new, reconstructing and modernizing existing industries. For investment projects included in the Economic Development Program of the Republic, the duration of benefits can range from three to ten years.

Corporate income tax rates have been reduced by 90% on amounts sent to the “Fund for Implementation of the Economic Development Program of the Komi Republic” for lending to republican programs, as well as on amounts provided free of charge by international financial institutions. Also reduced tax rates by 90% in the first three years and by 50% in the next two years for companies carrying out leasing operations- financial leasing, leasing of production technologies and equipment. Rates were reduced by 15% for insurance companies providing investment insurance, and by 25% for banks in terms of amounts allocated for regional investment. The property tax rate for companies creating new and reconstructing existing production facilities is reduced to 0.01% instead of 0.1% for the period from the moment costs are incurred until they are fully repaid. Legal entities engaged in investment activities are provided with a tax investment credit with a debt repayment period of two years within 5 years. In general, the amount of tax benefits cannot exceed the amount of investment. If the conditions are not met, the amount of tax payments, together with interest, is paid to the republican and local budgets.

In the Yaroslavl region, the tax rate for equipment purchased for investment needs has been reduced by 50% for a period of up to two years from the start of sales of products at the created facilities. There are also tax benefits on profits and financial institutions providing investment loans for the implementation of the state innovation program of the region. The regional government is

guarantor of investments that make up the commercial part of the investment program.

In accordance with the regional Law “On Investments in the Belgorod Region”, for investments aimed at projects vital for the region, the administration can act as one of the founders. When organizing new efficient production facilities, investors are provided with land plots with developed infrastructure. For legal entities investing their funds in the development of the regional economy, benefits and tax privileges are provided for a period of up to five years, up to complete exemption from paying taxes to the regional budget. In accordance with this Law, investors are independent in choosing the volumes, directions and efficiency of investments. Foreign investments are protected within the region and cannot be nationalized or confiscated.

Note that the choice of an appropriate method of stimulating investment activity depends on the extent to which local administrations can accumulate and manage financial resources in the form of budgetary and extrabudgetary funds, have the right to apply administrative measures that stimulate, limit and prohibit certain types of investment, provide benefits, privileges, rights to use the resources of the territory, and implement organizational measures in this area. The most effective is the integrated use of stimulation methods.

When using the economic incentive mechanism, one should always keep in mind that the provision of benefits and guarantees should be provided to those economic entities in the region that can achieve the most efficient use of investment resources in the shortest possible time.

Bibliography

1. Bukhvald E.M. Investment policy in the region. M.: Nauka, 1994. 140 p.

2. Golovina L.A. Economic development of the region and features of the formation of an effective regional investment policy. M.: MGIU, 2001. 152 p.

3. Economy of the region. Formation of a socially sustainable development strategy. Syktyvkar: SSU, 2002. 180 p.

4. Shibaeva N.A. Management of investment processes in the regions. M.: Mechanical Engineering-1. 2006. 295 p.

5. Economic potential administrative and production systems: monograph / ed. O.F. Balatsky. Sumy: University Book, 2006. 973 p.

Vorobyova Zhanna Borisovna, applicant, zhbvorob@,mail.ru, Russia, Tula, Tula State University

INVESTMENT POLICY IN THE REGION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS

In the article offers investment policies in the region as the core element of the economic policy of the State and economic entities with the establishment of the structure and scale of investment, the directions for their use, sources, bearing in mind the need to address the socio-economic challenges.

Key words: investment policy, economic policy, region, entity, address the socioeconomic tasks, tools, economic mechanism, investment activities.

Zhanna Vorobeva Borisovna, Applicant, zhbvorob@,mail. ru, Russia, Tula, Tula State University

TRAINING OF SUBCONTRACTORS IN THE INNOVATIVE BUSINESS INCUBATOR TULGU FOR DEFENSE ENTERPRISES

TULA REGION

V.Yu. Antsev, Yu.A. Chadayev

The activities of the Innovation Business Incubator of Tula State University are considered, including preparation for the creation of small innovative enterprises (SIEs), support for existing SIEs until they reach payback. The problems and prospects of SIE activities are considered.

Key words: business incubation, defense industry enterprises, small enterprises.

The task of increasing the innovative potential of the Russian Federation can be successfully solved on the basis of the widespread involvement of talented youth in innovation activities. One of the mechanisms used in this regard is small innovative entrepreneurship at universities. The transfer of innovative technologies from educational institutions to the economy through the creation of small firms at universities received legal status with the release of Federal Law No. 217-FZ of August 2, 2009 “On amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation on the creation of economic societies for the purpose of practical application (implementation) of the results of intellectual activity."

The Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation is also aimed at supporting small innovative entrepreneurship in Russian universities.

Panyagina Asya Evgenievna
candidate economic sciences, Head of the Department of Economics
Russia, Vladimir State University named after Alexander Grigorievich and Nikolai Grigorievich Stoletov
[email protected]

annotation

The article defines the essence, principles and main elements of a new type of regional investment policy - goal-oriented, the development of which makes it possible to implement a targeted approach to investment management, harmonize the interests of participants in investment activities and contribute to the growth of its efficiency.

Keywords

regional investment policy, goal-oriented investment policy, principles of regional investment policy, methods and tools for regulating investment activity

Financing

The article was prepared within the framework of scientific project No. 17-12-33002 supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research “Development of a goal-oriented investment policy for the region (using the example of the Vladimir region)”

Recommended link

Panyagina Asya Evgenievna

Goal-oriented regional investment policy: essence, principles and main elements// Regional economics and management: electronic scientific journal. ISSN 1999-2645. — . Article number: 5105. Publication date: 2017-08-21. Access mode: https://site/article/5105/

Panjagina Asja Evgen"evna
PHD, Head of Enterprise's Economy Department
Russia, Vladimir State University named Aleksandr Grigor"evich and Nikolaja Grigor"evich Stoletovyh
[email protected]

Abstract

In the article the essence, principles and main elements of a new type of regional investment policy - goal-oriented, the development of which allows for a targeted approach to investment management, reconcile the interests of participants of investment activity and boost its efficiency.

Keywords

Regional investment policy, goal-oriented investment policy, principles of regional investment policy, methods and instruments for regulating investment activities

Project finance

This article was prepared in part supported by RFBR, research project No. 17-12-33002 "Development of target-oriented investment policy of the region (on example of Vladimir region)"

Suggested Citation

Panjagina Asja Evgen"evna

Goal-oriented regional investment policy: the nature, principles and major elements. Regional economy and management: electronic scientific journal. . Art. #5105. Date issued: 2017-08-21. Available at: https://site/article/5105/


Introduction

A necessary prerequisite for modernizing the economy and improving the quality of life is high investment activity. To ensure this, serious efforts are being made in the regions to attract investors - regional legislation is being improved, regional marketing tools are being used, and a wide range of tax incentives are being offered. At the same time, measures to increase investment attractiveness are often aimed at any potential investors, are not focused, and do not take into account the subjective nature of the category of investment attractiveness and the possibility of forming the target attractiveness of objects of one level or another. On the one hand, this contributes to the implementation of the principle of equal rights of subjects of investment activity, and on the other hand, it does not provide clear guidelines regarding the specific properties of the region that create its advantage in competition for investments. Therefore, there is a need to develop special mechanisms for interaction with investors, based on a targeted approach and adequate to the conditions existing in the economy of a particular region.

The solution to the problems of increasing the investment attractiveness of the territory is carried out within the framework of the regional investment strategy and policy. The introduction of the Regional Investment Standard made it possible to systematize the work on the formation of investment strategies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. However, due attention has not been paid to the development of regional investment policy. Perhaps this was a consequence of the recognition of the priority of strategy over policy and the widespread idea of ​​investment policy as a system of activities, the program of which strategy actually includes, and therefore covers politics. The fallacy of this approach is seen in the fact that, at its core, politics is, first of all, an ideology and sets guidelines, without which strategic planning cannot be successful.

Thus, the current issues are the development and implementation of regional investment policy in general, and, in particular, policies that take into account the specifics of the region and the nature of its investment priorities.

The methodology for forming investment policy at the regional level was developed in the studies of E. S. Gubanova, V. M. Kruglyakova, D. P. Malyshev, M. Yu. Makhotaeva, M. A. Nikolaev, E. N. Naumova, N. Pshikanokova. I., Risina I.E., Suspitsyn S.A., Treshchevsky Yu.I., Khariton S.V., Shvakova E.E. and other scientists. Contributions to the development of approaches to understanding and assessing investment attractiveness were made by V.A. Babushkin, T.A. Burtseva, L.S. Valinurova, V.M. Vlasova, L.T. Gilyarovskaya, I.V. Grishina, G. Dzhurbaeva. K., Egorova M.G., Zhuravkova I.V., Endovitsky D.A., Kovalev V.V., Kreinina M.N., Krylov E.I., Marchenko G.V., Patrusheva E.G. , Roizman I.I., Sevryugin Yu.V., Shakhnazarov A.G. and other authors. Both components of the general scientific problem of substantiating effective ways to manage investment activities, namely, increasing investment attractiveness and forming investment policy at the meso level, have been studied very deeply, but their development remains multidirectional. Therefore, at the moment, the urgent task seems to be to combine these components with a simultaneous shift in emphasis from developing a methodology for the most accurate assessment of the level of investment attractiveness to finding opportunities for its use in managing investment activities, and from developing the best universal option for regional investment policy to differentiating these options. To solve this problem, in the course of previous research, the author substantiated target investment attractiveness as an economic category and a numerically assessed indicator that provides the basis for developing mechanisms for interaction with investors. A logical continuation is an attempt to propose a new type of investment policy - goal-oriented, the object of which is the target investment attractiveness of the region, and main feature– the opportunity to implement a targeted approach to investment management and coordinate the interests of investment entities.

The logic of considering the key properties of regional investment policy

The complexity and versatility of the generic category “investment” also determines the multiplicity of aspects of related and derived categories. In this regard, the study of regional investment policy (RIP) requires systematization of the key properties that make up its content. Such systematization can be carried out within the framework of four interrelated conceptual aspects: essential, systemic, attitudinal and structural.

The essential aspect determines the fundamental understanding of the content of RIP as a management category, which makes it possible to clarify its place in the investment activity management system at the meso level. This can be done from the standpoint of the systemic aspect, which involves specifying the subjects and objects of investment policy, designating its role in the regional investment system. The attitudinal and structural aspects make it possible to show how the role of investment policy is implemented in investment management in the region. Within the framework of the installation aspect, the target settings of the RIP are clarified and structured, the relationship between strategy and policy is determined, and their differentiation is made. The structural aspect covers a full range of elements of investment policy, the composition and application of which depend on the targets and the nature of the region’s investment priorities.

Essential aspect

One of the most cited was the definition of investment policy given in the Dictionary of Modern Economic Terms: “Investment policy is component economic policy pursued by the state and enterprises in the form of establishing the structure and scale of investments, directions for their use, sources of receipt, taking into account the need to update fixed assets and improve their technical level.”

In the understanding of V.V. Hodusa, RIP - “this is component regional economic policy, carried out purposefully by agents of reproductive activity in the territory, in particular federal, subfederal, regional and municipal authorities and management, as well as other entities (investors), aimed at mobilizing and effectively using the investment potential of the territory, at activating and stimulating investment processes in the region and achieving the set development goals (self-development) of the region.”

According to E.N. Novokshonova, “...regional investment policy is component regional economic policy, including targeted and scientifically based activity regional authorities to mobilize and effectively develop the investment potential of the territory, activate and stimulate investment processes in the region, ensuring the achievement of strategic goals and objectives of economic growth of the region."

The property of investment policy to be an integral part (type) of economic policy is very important for revealing its essence, since it allows it to be projected onto investment policy character traits inherent in economic policy as a whole. However, this quality in itself does not reveal the essence of the category “investment policy”.

The most common point of view is that investment policy is a system of measures, actions or activities to regulate investment processes.

P.Yu. Osipov writes: “Thus, the essence of investment policy can be defined as the targeted, science-based activities of regional authorities and management to attract and effectively use investment resources to solve problems of socio-economic development of the region and improve the quality of life of its population.”

I.V. Savon emphasizes: “various approaches to defining the concept of regional investment policy indicate its most reasonable understanding as a system of measures and a mechanism for their implementation aimed at stimulating the investment activity of business entities and creating a favorable investment climate in the region.”

M.A. Nikolaev, M.Yu. Makhotaeva, E.N. Naumova, based on a detailed consideration of investment policy, conclude: “Thus, regional investment policy is understood as a system of measures carried out at the regional level that contribute to the mobilization of investment resources and the determination of directions for their most effective and rational use in the interests of the population of the region and individual investors.”

Approaches to understanding RIP as an activity and system of measures, despite their widespread use, also do not fully accurately reflect its content, since their attention is focused on external manifestations, and not on the essence of investment policy as a management category. In this regard, the definition of V.M. is more correct. Kruglyakova: “Regional investment policy is a management category that reflects the diversity of connections in the system of purposefully regulated processes occurring in the technical, technological, organizational, economic, institutional subsystems of society, and manifests itself at a lower level of abstraction in the form of strategic, tactical and operational actions of subjects management... The essence of regional investment policy is a system of relations regarding the formation of compensation and accumulation funds in the regional social product.”

And finally, there are interpretations of investment policy as an ideology, a general (general) line, a concept that forms the basis for managing investment activities in the region. This point of view is expressed by N.I. Pshikanokova: “The investment policy of the region is the ideological basis for creating an institutional structure, legal framework and economic prerequisites creating a favorable investment climate.” In this regard, any investment proposal must have some basis - the so-called investment concept.

Assessing the impact of state investment policy on the effectiveness of the national socio-economic system, N.A. Vodopyanova comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to consider state investment policy as a concept for effective management of the investment process, the content of which is the strategic idea of ​​​​organizing investment activity and a set of tactical measures to regulate economic relations in investment processes at all levels.

It is this approach to understanding the essence of the region’s investment policy that seems to be the most correct.

Attitudinal aspect

Within the framework of the installation aspect, the priorities, goals and objectives of regional investment policy are considered.

The work identifies three key approaches to understanding the essence and targets of RIP: reproductive, socio-economic and strategic. Proponents of these approaches consider the main goals of RIP, respectively: reproduction of fixed assets, capital resources, social reproduction in general; socio-economic development of the region; structural restructuring of the economy. An analysis of works on this topic showed that the second approach can be considered the most common. So, Risin I.E., Khariton S.V. The main goal of investment policy is “ensuring sustainable economic growth and, on this basis, achieving a consistent improvement in the quality of life of the population.” A similar formulation is given in the work: “the main goal of investment policy can be formulated as ensuring a consistent improvement in the quality of life of the population based on sustainable innovative economic growth.” Note that in this case, the goal of investment policy is replaced by the goal of economic policy as a whole, which is a consequence of understanding the RIP as its component part.

The following definitions of the main goal of investment policy are more accurate: investment support production sphere and on its basis the progressive development of the region, effective investment support for the process of comprehensive socio-economic development of the region, achieving a balanced growth in the quality of life of the population.

The goals of the second level and (or) objectives of the RIP are: creation of an efficiently operating infrastructure of the regional investment market, creation of favorable conditions for attracting foreign and Russian investment in the regional economy, search for objects and areas acceptable from the point of view of efficiency for investment, support for investment and innovation activities and a number of others. It is common to divide goals and objectives into strategic and tactical, to structure goals and objectives by levels, by areas - institutional, macro, meso and micro. This principle of establishing the goals and objectives of the RIP is, in turn, a consequence of its interpretation as a system of measures to regulate investment activities.

Strategic and tactical goals of investment development are specified within the framework of the investment strategy and program measures for its implementation; understanding investment policy as an ideology for managing investment activities requires the formulation of goals of a different plan. We can agree that the main goal of the RIP is investment support for the process of socio-economic development of the region. But, since in conditions of an acute shortage of investment resources this goal is achieved subject to the high investment attractiveness of the territory, the goals of the second level (RIP objectives) should include, first of all, justification of the concept, principles, priorities and mechanisms for their implementation, they should be aimed at the formation of such investment characteristics of the region that will increase its attractiveness for a specific type of investor.

System aspect

The subjects of investment policy at the regional level are regional and municipal government authorities, investors, enterprises and organizations, and other participants in investment activities. In the narrowest interpretation, RIP objects include fixed assets and intangible assets, capital resources. Supporters of the socio-economic approach to understanding investment policy include enterprises belonging to industries and areas of activity that are priority for the region in terms of ensuring its competitive advantages, socially significant enterprises, infrastructure facilities. Proponents of the strategic approach include investment activities and the investment climate as objects of RIP.

Indeed, in a broad sense, the object of RIP is investment activity. At the same time, in order to solve the problem of forming the investment characteristics of the region, which will increase its attractiveness for certain target groups of investors, a necessary condition is the development of a new type of investment policy - goal-oriented, the object of which is the target investment attractiveness of the region.

The role of RIP in the regional investment system is determined by its content as an ideology for managing investment activities. The policy sets the investment concept and management principles, which are set out in the investment declaration and the Regional Strategy, determines the choice of investment development priorities, methods and regulatory tools. The investment strategy, as a plan for implementing the region's priorities, is based on an investment policy that serves as a guide.

Structural aspect

The most important elements of regional investment policy are investment concept, principles, methods and tools for regulating investment activities.

Investment concept

An investment concept is a fundamental idea, a system of views that defines the principles of investment management, strategic goals, priorities, methods and management mechanisms. The choice of investment concept can be resource, integration, world economic, innovation, social basis.

The resource base makes it possible to ensure the investment attractiveness of a region that has minerals, natural and recreational resources, favorable conditions for Agriculture, tourism and recreation.

The integration basis of the investment concept involves the development of territorial and sectoral integration, ensuring the implementation of a multiplier and synergistic effect. The implementation of the investment concept of the integration type occurs mainly in the form of the formation of clusters in the regional economy. However, scientific research in a different direction is possible here. In particular, the subject of an independent part of this study is to assess the possibilities of applying the principles of portfolio investment to the development of RIP.

The innovative basis makes it possible to create long-term advantages in competition for investment resources and provides ample opportunities for reconciling conflicting economic interests. The benefits created are durable and provide sustainable long-term investment. But to create these advantages, serious scientific and human resources are needed; the formation of innovation policy at the same time requires strengthening its social orientation. The process of organizing innovative production is capital-intensive, and investments in it are risky.

The formation of the world economic basis of the investment concept involves the search for advantages associated with the activation of foreign economic relations: the development of export-oriented or import-substituting industries, the use of the experience of countries with similar socio-economic conditions, the creation of special economic zones. IN modern conditions the choice of a global economic investment concept is associated with increased risk, since it makes the regional economy highly dependent on the state of foreign economic relations and the foreign policy situation.

The choice of investment concept is based on a detailed analysis of the characteristics of the region, which will allow one to classify it as belonging to one type or another, and identify those properties of the region on which its target investment attractiveness can be based. On this basis, investment priorities can be selected and target audiences of investors can be identified. Clarification of investment priorities and target audiences of investors makes it possible to develop the optimal investment policy option for a given region. In this study, we call such a policy goal-oriented.

Principles of regional investment policy

In the scientific literature, there are about twenty principles of RIP, the main of which are: consistency, complexity, efficiency and achieving a balance of interests. The key principles of the RIP, proclaimed in the investment declarations of the regions, were the principles of equality, transparency, inclusion and the application of best practices. The composition of the investment policy principles is systematized in Table 1.

Table 1 – Principles of investment policy

Composition of principles Content
Optimal risk, socio-economic security Using mechanisms to counter internal and external threats, establishing limit values ​​for security indicators.
Focus The need to focus on specific investment goals that will provide solutions to the problems of regional development.
Differentiation Security full accounting specifics and competitive advantages of the territory.
Priority The advantage of certain areas, directions, objects and projects.
Flexibility, adaptability Adjustment of investment policy, adaptation to external conditions and other factors.
Equality A non-discriminatory approach to all subjects of business and investment activity within the framework of a predetermined and public system of priorities; provision e equal competitive conditions economic activity investors regardless of their form of ownership.
Engagement Participation of business and investment entities in the process of preparing decisions affecting their interests, adopted by government bodies of the region, as well as in assessing the implementation of these decisions.
Transparency, publicity, openness, predictability. Availability of information about the goals and priorities of authorities regional administration, the main stages of the formation of regional investment policy, the progress of its implementation.
Application of best practices Orientation of administrative procedures and legal regulation on the best practice of interaction between constituent entities of the Russian Federation and subjects of business and investment activities.
Systematic and comprehensive Formation of policy taking into account the totality of relations and connections between all its spheres, ensuring their unity and interconnected elaboration, taking into account conditions and factors of different nature (economic, social, organizational and legal); taking into account internal and external factors influencing the formation of investment flows; creation of system-wide mechanisms for legal and state regulation of investment activities; formation of an investment policy that promotes a balanced functioning of all components of the regional socio-economic system.
Efficiency Achieving, as a result of investment policy, an improvement in the quality of life of the population with minimal financial and social costs; implementation of the most effective, from the position of strategic integrated socio-economic development, version of its policy in the investment sphere.
Achieving a balance of interests Coordination of interests of all subjects of the region’s investment activity system; respecting the interests of all participants in the investment process: the state, enterprises of all forms of ownership, and the population of the territory.

In the context of this study, the most important are those principles that make it possible to implement a targeted approach to managing investment activities in the region, in particular the principles of focus, priority, balance and targeting.

Methods and tools for regulating investment activities

The methods and instruments for regulating investment activity used within the framework of RIP are in inextricable unity with its essential content. As noted above, investment policy is understood by a number of authors as a system of measures and mechanisms for their implementation. The distinction between the concepts of “methods” and “instruments” of regulation is made in the work. Investment policy methods should be understood as methods of influencing the investment sphere used by management subjects to achieve their goals. The implementation of one or another management method is carried out through the practical use of specific tools, which “in relation to investment policy... are understood as specific parameters of investment activity management methods.” In other words, RIP tools are specific actions and measures by which investment activity is managed. Classification methods for regulating investment activities is shown in Table 2.

Table 2 – Classification of methods for regulating investment activities

Signs Kinds Examples of specific tools
1. By method (form) of influence Direct — development of standards, establishment of licensing procedures, state registration rights to real estate and transactions with it, conditions for the provision of guarantees and sureties;
— development, examination, approval and financing of investment projects;
— direct management of public investments and participation in them
Indirect — improving the tax system, the mechanism for calculating depreciation and use depreciation charges;
— establishment of special tax regimes, not of an individual nature;
— creating opportunities for subjects of investment activity to form their own investment funds.
2. By content (type of tools used) Administrative — development of the regulatory framework regulating investment activities in the region;
— control over the targeted use of budget funds;
Economic — system of tax and credit benefits
— property support for investors
— provision of government orders
Institutional
— infrastructure development;
— creation of special economic zones
Socio-psychological — formation of a favorable investment image of the region;
— public discussion of investment programs, monitoring of public opinion;
— use of a system of moral incentives
3. By the degree of coverage of the investment sphere Global (general) — use of the refinancing rate (key rate) as a tool for regulating the monetary sphere;
— unified regulations for project support based on the “one window” principle;
— implementation of the “benefits in exchange for investments” program
Selective (variable, differentiated application) — targeted work with the largest industry investors;
- preferential terms of use land plots(by type of economic activity or for small businesses);
— placement on the region’s investment portal of a rating of reliable organizations, broken down by industry or business scale.
4. By target characteristic Methods that ensure the interests of the state; — establishing the responsibility of subjects of investment activities;
- environmental assessment;
— control of the targeted use of budget funds.
Methods to ensure the creation of generally favorable conditions for investment activity — creation and functioning of development institutions;
— simplification of permitting procedures;
— protection of investors’ interests;
— formation of a mechanism for guaranteeing the rights of subjects of investment activities.
Methods for mobilizing investment financing sources — direct participation of the state in the financing of investment projects;
— subsidizing interest on investment loans and leasing, costs of placing securities;
— activation of mechanisms for mobilizing investment resources, such as securitization of assets, individual investment accounts, use of investment banking services.
5. By stages of investment activity (suggested by the author) Methods to promote the formation of a favorable investment climate — improvement of investment legislation;
— creation of a Regional Investment Fund;
— development of logistics centers, technical, industrial, industrial and industrial parks, business incubators;
— formation of a favorable investment image.
Methods aimed at implementing investment priorities — regional programs to attract investments;
— creation of effective information channels for interaction with target investors;
— measures of economic support for priority industries.
Methods aimed at increasing investment efficiency — assistance in the development of programs for energy saving, resource conservation, and increasing labor productivity;
— assistance in the territorial location of production;
— targeted orders for the training of specialists;
— implementation of territorial and sectoral integration programs.

The division of regulatory methods into direct and indirect is enshrined in the Federal Law “On investment activities in the Russian Federation, carried out in the form capital investments" dated February 25, 1999 No. 39-FZ.

Indirect methods are aimed at creating favorable conditions for the development of investment activity by improving tax and depreciation policies, development financial leasing and other measures. Using direct methods, incentives are created for business entities to make investment decisions, the nature of which meets the goals of investment policy.

Direct methods involve the direct participation of the state in investment activities through the development, approval and financing of investment projects and programs, as well as the application of a set of requirements mandatory for execution by business entities.

Economic methods make it possible to create material incentives that encourage participants in investment activities to make decisions that meet both their own interests and the interests of the entire society. According to the method of influence, they can be both direct and indirect.

Institutional methods have been developed in the form of the creation of a number of institutions that ensure the implementation of the region's investment strategy. As stated on the official website of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation, “development institutions act as a catalyst for private investment in priority sectors and sectors of the economy and create conditions for the formation of infrastructure that provides access to the necessary financial and information resources for enterprises operating in priority sectors of the economy.” This group of methods may also include the development of investment infrastructure, the creation of special economic zones and similar measures.

Social and psychological methods of regulating investment activity are aimed at creating a favorable investment image, using moral incentives, and making the investment process open.

Within the classification criterion “according to the degree of coverage of the investment sphere,” global and selective methods of regulation are distinguished. Global means methods that “have an impact not only on the investment sphere of a country or region, but also on the economy of the country as a whole,” and selective methods “are aimed at regulating the activities of individual investors at both the micro and macro levels.” Another interpretation is possible: global (general) methods are universal, applicable to objects of any level and type of activity, regardless of the specifics of the region, industry or specific object. Selective methods are applied selectively, depending on the type of investor, the specifics of the type of economic activity or object, and the nature of the region’s investment priorities.

Maltsagova T.M. a classification of methods for regulating investment activity according to target criteria has been proposed, methods that ensure the interests of the state, methods that ensure the creation of general favorable conditions for investment activity, and methods for mobilizing sources of investment financing have been identified. In accordance with the objectives of the study, the mechanism for using methods for mobilizing sources of investment financing has been most fully developed.

A feature of goal-oriented investment policy is its focus on achieving specific goals that take into account the specifics of the region, the investment concept and the nature of investment priorities. Within the framework of this study, it is proposed to structure the goals of investment development by stages of investment activity. At the stage of creating investment conditions, the formation of a favorable investment climate is ensured. At the stage of investment activity, work is systematized to attract investors and achieve the specified investment characteristics in terms of volumes, structure of sources and directions of investments. At the stage of forming investment results, the tasks of developing competitive industries and human capital are set. For each stage, corresponding goals, objectives and targets are formulated. To successfully achieve the set goals, a corresponding principle for classifying methods for regulating investment activity is also necessary (clause 5 of Table 2). At the stage of creating investment conditions, general methods are applied to promote the formation of a favorable investment climate, including through improving the institutional conditions for conducting investment activities, creating and developing investment infrastructure. At this stage, institutional methods and investment administration methods are effective. At the stage of investment activity, investment priorities must be implemented, which can be achieved subject to the coordination of economic interests, and not only by ensuring the interests of the state. Since the nature of the investment priority of industries in the region is different, the composition of target audiences of investors and, as a consequence, the composition of methods of influence also differ. Therefore, at this stage, selective methods are used, and regulatory instruments are modeled by industry groups and types of investors. At the stage of forming investment results, the greatest importance is organizational methods, contributing to increased efficiency, but not involving direct or indirect financing of investment costs.

Creating a universal set regulatory instruments investment activities impossible, their composition depends on the specific tasks of the RIP. At the same time, it is not the variety of tools that is of decisive importance, but the possibility of their flexible use, which allows for targeted impacts.

Methods for modeling investment policy instruments are proposed in the works of A.V. Gorlov, V.M. Kruglyakova, E.E. Shvakova.

A.V. Gorlov divides the methods of state regulation at the regional level into legal, direct, indirect and organizational. Legal include administrative regulations. Direct ones cover: targeted regional programs for the development of industries; regional budget and off-budget funds; direct government investments; regional norms and standards and other measures. Indirect tools include: stimulating preferential taxation, preferential loan rates; credit measures to stimulate exports and others. Measures of organizational assistance to investment activities include the initiation of investment activities through information and advisory activities, state protectionism of investment goods. The author proposes to determine the ratio of methods and tools for regulating the investment sphere for each element depending on its attractiveness. Legal and organizational instruments of influence are relevant for all types of activities. For the most attractive industries, these regulatory instruments are sufficient; in the author’s opinion, they should be completely freed from direct and indirect regulation. A group of economic activities whose attractiveness is above average should include instruments of indirect impact. For a group of activities that have normal attractiveness, in addition to those listed, it is necessary to use the entire spectrum indirect methods investment policy. For the least attractive, direct measures of financial support should be applied.

V.M. Kruglyakova, in order to harmonize the multidirectional goals of subjects of investment activity, proposes a distinction between general and specific (invariant and variable) principles and instruments of regulation. Their composition and application are determined, respectively, by the general and different goals and interests of the subjects, general conditions and the specific state of investment activity in the regions. The researcher comes to the conclusion that it is fundamentally impossible to form a single, universal investment strategy for the region and the need to develop basic types of strategies focused on relatively homogeneous groups of regions, differentiated by the combination, on the one hand, of factors and conditions of investment activity and its results, on the other. For modeling basic strategies options for the “structural composition of the implementation tools” of basic investment strategies are proposed. Thus, for regions with an average level of resource potential and investment results, a set of tools is provided, divided by levels (for government bodies and business entities) and management subsystems (organizational, economic, personnel, marketing and information support).

The principle and methods of modeling investment activity management tools proposed by V.M. Kruglyakova are of great value. But there are a number of points that need adjustment. Firstly, the regulatory tools need to be formed when developing investment policy, not strategy. Secondly, the scope of analysis should include not only the existing factors and conditions of investment activity, on the one hand, and its results, on the other, but also the functional stage of investment activity, mediating the conditions and results. It is at this stage that the need for control actions is highest. Thirdly, if combining regulatory instruments into four subsystems is rational, then dividing the composition of instruments only by management levels is not enough; it should be more detailed.

HER. Shvakov proposed a division of RIP instruments into four functional areas: tools for motivating and encouraging investors; information tools; tools for developing the region's investment potential; investment administration. The first two groups of tools affect external factors investment attractiveness. The second two groups are an integral part of the domestic investment environment. However, this division is quite arbitrary; a number of instruments operate both within the region and outside it. Therefore, at the same time, the instruments are divided into substantive, basic, defining contours of the region’s investment policy, and organizational ones, which are derived from the main ones. The substantive component includes incentive instruments, primarily of a fiscal and financial nature, as well as instruments for the development of investment potential - financing of production infrastructure and personnel training. Organizational tools ensure the implementation of the basic ones and include information support, the main task of which is to form a positive image of the region and communicate to investors information about investment projects, rules and procedures for carrying out investment activities. A logical continuation of this functional area is investment administration, which includes consulting, minimizing procedural burdens, creating a “single window” system and other forms of working with investors.

The principles of goal-oriented investment policy predetermine the ways of modeling its tools. The system of regulatory methods is built on the basis of economic interests and priorities. Regulatory methods are grouped according to the stages at which they influence, instruments - based on the establishment of object-subject relationships, which involve correlating objects grouped by priority with subjects whose interests are related to the state of these objects. The RIP mechanism should offer sets of general and specific regulatory tools, from which structured packages of methods are formed.

The composition of specific tools is proposed to be determined in four functional areas: information, personnel, organizational and economic support. Within each direction, tools are divided into general and selective (targeted impact). The latter are applied selectively, depending on the relationships between objects and subjects of investment, grouped by priority.

Yes, in the subsystem information support General tools may include: the formation of a bank of innovative ideas, the organization of remote interaction between investors and regional executive authorities, the systematization of the content of the Investment portal in terms of presentation regulatory framework, priority sectors, support measures. The selective tools of this subsystem include the distribution of information materials, the preparation and posting on the website of a detailed and understandable manual for the development and justification of investment projects and the calculation of their effectiveness indicators with practical examples, compiling a rating of investment-attractive enterprises with placement of rating data and investment passports of the ten best enterprises in the industry on the portal (in the matrix of investment-attractive industries), etc.

To general subsystem tools staffing include: the formation of a regional educational system with the development of a personnel training standard and the provision of grants on a competitive basis for the implementation of educational programs in priority areas of training, the participation of civil servants in training programs, seminars on investment activities and the assessment of investment projects. Selective tools: conducting training seminars on issues of supporting investment activities, forming a targeted order for the training of specialists in the pre-investment phase of the implementation of an investment project, and others.

Organizational support general application: simplification of permitting procedures, unified regulations for project support based on the “one window” principle, industrial, industrial, logistics, agro-industrial, scientific and technological parks. Selective instruments of organizational support: the creation of a Regional Investment Fund and the Regional Bank for Reconstruction and Development, targeted work with the largest industry investors, assistance in the creation of production facilities that meet the requirements of high efficiency: high-tech material- and energy-saving, environmentally friendly technologies that ensure a high degree of processing of the raw materials used ( using the experience of the Voronezh region), etc.

Economic support relevant for working with all investors in any industry: programs “benefits in exchange for investments”, extension of the system of tax benefits to organizations providing investment loans and credits. Economic support for differentiated use: provision of tax incentives and investment credit to organizations carrying out modernization and re-equipment of fixed assets, implementation of resource saving and cost reduction programs, increasing production efficiency, subsidizing the cost of paying for services for technological connection to engineering support networks, activating mechanisms for mobilizing investment resources such as securitization of assets, individual investment accounts, use of investment banking services.

Each subsystem includes from 10 to 20 types of specific instruments of influence, the broadest being the organizational subsystem.

Schematic modeling of regional investment policy instruments is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 – Modeling of RIP tools

Legend: I – information support tools; K – personnel support tools, O – organizational support tools, E – economic support tools

An example of using the proposed method for modeling RIP tools:

For the Vladimir region, chemical production is a growing industry with high investment attractiveness; the target audience is investors external to the region. In managing the investment activities of enterprises in this industry, in addition to the general ones, the following tools of targeted influence are applicable:

  • information support – presentation activities, inclusion in the investment directory, participation in competitions “Best Organizations of the Vladimir Region” with placement of the investment passport of enterprises included in the winners on the portal;
  • staffing: using the right to tax benefits when establishing a high level of wages, the right to subsidize the costs of training, taking into account the industry's needs for specialists when forecasting the regional labor market;
  • organizational support: assistance to investors in the territorial location of production, organization of presentation events in the region, implementation of the program cluster development, holding meetings and round tables with business representatives.

Features of goal-oriented investment policy

Target-oriented investment policy of the region represents a systemic unity of the ideological concept of managing investment activity in the region as a set of ordered views expressing the interests of participants in investment activity, on the one hand, and a management mechanism aimed at coordinating interests, on the other. This understanding determines the relationship between investment policy and investment strategy of the region. The policy determines the investment concept, principles, priorities, and determines the choice of methods and tools. The strategy contains a plan of specific measures to implement investment development priorities, which is developed and implemented based on the guidelines set by the investment policy.

Within the framework of a goal-oriented investment policy, the composition of subjects of investment activity is interpreted broadly, it includes both regional and municipal authorities and management, as well as investors, enterprises and organizations, and other interested parties. The expanded interpretation of the composition of subjects is due to the desire to cover the maximum range of economic interests of participants in investment activities. On the contrary, the idea of ​​the RIP object is narrow and differs from the known approaches, according to which the objects of regional investment policy are fixed assets, capital resources, investment activity and the investment climate. In the context of goal-oriented RIP, the target investment attractiveness is considered as an object, economic entity which consists in the quantitative expression of the measure of achieving a balance of economic interests of business entities, investors, the region and the state, the completeness of the implementation of the goals they set. This feature determines the name of the proposed investment policy – ​​goal-oriented.

The main setting of goal-oriented investment policy - investment support for the process of socio-economic development of the region - is consistent with one of the points of view common in the scientific literature. The difference lies, firstly, in the fact that this goal is achieved through the formation of such investment characteristics of the region that will increase its attractiveness for investors of a particular type. Secondly, the objectives of the RIP are not limited to specific activities, they are more general in nature and include:

  • selection of the concept and priorities of investment development,
  • development of principles for managing investment activities,
  • developing a mechanism for coordinating the interests of economic entities,
  • formation of target investment attractiveness.

The elements of regional investment policy in the classical sense include, in addition to goals and objectives, priorities, principles, methods and tools for regulating investment activity. Target-oriented investment policy also covers these elements, but there are differences on a number of points.

First of all, the most important element of a goal-oriented policy is the investment concept - a fundamental idea, a system of views that defines priorities and goals, principles and tools, both in composition and in the specifics of application. The choice of investment concept is based on an analysis of the properties of the region and its potential advantages in competition for investment resources, which, as mentioned above, can have a resource, world economic, integration, innovation, and social basis. In works of a theoretical nature, the formation of an investment concept is usually not discussed, and in the practice of managing investment activities, the author knows of only one example that is similar in essence. In strategy Kaluga region in fact, the concept of the region’s investment policy is presented - “Man is the center of investment.” To justify investment priorities, a methodology is used, tested on the example of the Vladimir region and which made it possible to clarify the composition of priorities and position industries in terms of their compliance with the goals of private investors and the goals of balanced development of the Vladimir region. This made it possible to establish the composition of target audiences of investors, specific problems of development of the territory and propose targeted measures. This technique can also be considered as one of the elements of a goal-oriented investment policy.

In the theory and practice of managing investment activities in the region, many principles are used, the number of which seems somewhat excessive. In addition to the general principles, namely the principles of equality, security, transparency, and the application of best practices, it is proposed to highlight four special principles of a goal-oriented investment policy. The principle of purposefulness is to focus on specific investment goals that will ensure full consideration of the specifics and competitive advantages of the region. Priority principle– when developing RIP, it is necessary to be based on economic interests and selected investment priorities. The principle of balanceeffective management investment activity in the region is possible only if the conflicting interests of participants in investment activity are reconciled. Targeting principle– the system of methods for regulating investment activities and forms of support is applied differentially depending on the investment priority of the industry and the target audience of investors.

Goal-oriented investment policy operates with the same methods and tools that are used to regulate investment activities in established practice. But in order to increase the efficiency of their use, it is proposed to supplement the existing classification with a new feature, dividing the methods according to the stages of investment activity into three groups: those promoting the formation of a favorable investment climate, aimed at implementing investment priorities and aimed at increasing the efficiency of investments.

A number of researchers substantiate the advantages of flexible use of known instruments for regulating investment activity. However, this approach has not yet been implemented in practice. An analysis of regional legislation and Investment strategies posted on the portals of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation shows that the list of regulatory instruments is almost the same, only the volumes of benefits and benefits provided differ. This proves the need to further search for ways to model RIP tools that could become in demand in practical work. Therefore, the instruments of goal-oriented investment policy are systematized according to the principle of correlating objects, grouped by priority, with subjects whose interests are related to the state of these objects. The tools include four functional areas (information, personnel, organizational and economic support), in each of which the tools are divided into general and selective, targeted impacts.

Thus, goal-oriented investment policy has both similarities and distinctive features in comparison with existing views on regional investment policy. For a clearer picture, the existing differences are reflected in Table 3.

Table 3 – The main differences between goal-oriented investment policy and the classical understanding of the region’s investment policy

Key properties and (or) elements of regional investment policy In the classical understanding of the region’s investment policy In the context of the region’s goal-oriented investment policy
The essence of regional investment policy An integral part of the economic policy of the region, activities, a system of measures to mobilize investment resources The ideology of managing investment activities in the region
The relationship between investment strategy and policy Priority of investment strategy, strategy development covers policy Interrelation and parity of investment policy and strategy
An object Fixed assets and intangible assets, capital resources, investment climate, investment activity Target investment attractiveness of the region
Tasks Implementation of specific measures, such as: increasing the transparency of the economy and investments, ensuring economic security investments, ensuring equal opportunities for investors, creating an effective transformation mechanism banking resources in investment, reducing the cost of credit resources, maximizing the use of enterprises’ own funds, etc. Definition of the concept, priorities, principles of investment development, formation of target investment attractiveness and development of mechanisms for coordinating economic interests
Investment concept Typically not considered Is the defining element
Principles Broad composition, including more than 20 principles Less broad set of principles: focus, priority, balance, targeting
Methods for regulating investment activities They are classified according to a number of characteristics: method of influence, content, degree of coverage of the investment sphere, target characteristics and others. Well-known classification criteria are used. Greater importance is attached to the classification criterion “according to the degree of coverage of the investment sphere” (general and selective methods). The system of methods is complemented by their division into stages of investment activity that are affected.
Instruments for regulating investment activities A number of proprietary approaches to modeling tools, differing depending on the subject and goals of the study It is proposed to model tools by priority groups and target audiences investors

conclusions

Consideration of the essence of regional investment policy leads to the conclusion that the most correct is its understanding as an ideology for managing investment activities. The main goal of the RIP is investment support for the process of socio-economic development of the region, but since in conditions of an acute shortage of investment resources this goal is achieved subject to the high investment attractiveness of the territory, the main tasks of the RIP (second level goals) should include: selection of the concept and priorities of investment development, development of principles for managing investment activities, development of a mechanism for coordinating the interests of economic entities, formation of such investment characteristics of the region that will increase its attractiveness for investors of a particular type (formation of targeted investment attractiveness). To solve these problems, the formation of a special type of investment policy is required - goal-oriented, the object of which is the target investment attractiveness.

The most important elements of regional investment policy are the investment concept, principles, methods and tools for regulating investment activity. An investment concept can have a resource, integration, global economic or innovation basis. The choice of concept is based on a detailed analysis of the characteristics of the region, which identifies those properties on which the target investment attractiveness of the region can be based, making it possible to develop the optimal investment policy option. The key principles of a goal-oriented investment policy are focus, priority, balanced targeting. The composition of the principles determines the method of forming the RIP mechanism. Methods for regulating investment activity are divided by the stages at which they affect, instruments - by groups of investment priorities.

Bibliography

  1. Federal Law “On investment activities in the Russian Federation, carried out in the form of capital investments” dated February 25, 1999 No. 39-FZ.
  2. Vinogray O.M., Abramov S.A., Konakova S.V. Regional investment policy and investment activity of the region // Competitiveness. Innovation. Finance. 2011. No. 2. – p. 7-10.
  3. Vodopyanova N.A. The influence of state investment policy on the efficiency of the socio-economic system: abstract of the dissertation for the degree of candidate of economic sciences / Volgograd State University. Volgograd, 2008. – 23 p.
  4. Gorlov A.V. The mechanism for implementing investment policy based on assessing the potential for investment attractiveness of the region (using the example of the Amur region) // Russian Economic Internet Journal. 2009. No. 2. – p. 247-253.
  5. Igoshin N.V. Investments. Organization of management and financing. – M: UNITY-DANA, 2002. – 112 p.
  6. Krugliakova V.M. Regional investment policy: theoretical and methodological foundations, methodological and instrumental support. Abstract of thesis. Dan. Voronezh. 2013. – 40 p.
  7. Ksenofontov V.I., Zaikov V.P. Experience in the formation of regulatory support for regional investment policy // Problems of modern economics (Novosibirsk). 2010. No. 1-1. - With. 201-206.
  8. Maltsagova T.M. Principles and methods of financing the investment process at the regional level: abstract of the dissertation for the degree of candidate of economic sciences / Ivanovo State University of Chemical Technology. Ivanovo, 2011. – 18 p.
  9. Makhotaeva M. Yu. et al. Formation of investment policy at the regional level: monograph. - Pskov: Pskov State University, 2015. – 224 p.
  10. Nikolaev M.A., Makhotaeva M.Yu., Naumova E.N. Methodological aspects of the formation of regional investment policy // Bulletin of Pskov State University, 2015, No. 1. – p. 83-91
  11. Novokshonova E.N. Assessing the effectiveness of regional investment policy // Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 2014, No. 11. – p. 49-60
  12. Osipov P.Yu. Investment climate of regions as an object of influence of regional investment policy // Bulletin of Tambov University. Series: Humanities. 2008. No. 8 (64). - With. 412-416.
  13. Petrov A.V. Investment policy of the region: focus on innovation // Creative economy. 2012. No. 7. – p. 54-59.
  14. Podmolodina I.M., Avtsinov O.I. Increasing the investment attractiveness of the region: the experience of the Voronezh region // Bulletin of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies. 2014. No. 4 (62). - With. 226-230.
  15. Pshikanokova N.I. Regional investment policy: institutional and economic mechanism of strategic management // Bulletin of the Adygea State University. 2005. No. 4. – p. 35-65.
  16. Raizberg B.A. Dictionary of modern economic terms / Raizberg B.A., Lozovsky L.Sh. and others. M.: Iris-Press, 2009. – 476 p.
  17. Risin I.E., Khariton S.V. Regional investment policy: content, principles of development and implementation // http://www.lerc.ru/?art=4&page=12&part=bulletin
  18. Savon I.V. Systematic approach to managing investment processes at the regional level // Financial Research. 2012. No. 1. – p. 128-132.
  19. Factors of sustainable development of Russian regions: monograph / G.R. Gibadatova, T.S. Grinko, A.A. Davydova and others / Under the general. ed. S.S. Chernova. – Book 16. – Novosibirsk: CRNS Publishing House, 2014. – 283 p.
  20. Khodus V.V. The essence and main dominants of regional investment policy // Bulletin of SamGUPS No. 1 (11), 2011. – p. 111-116
  21. Shvakov E.E. Investment mechanism in the territories of regional development // News of Altai State University, 2014. No. 2-1. - With. 313-316
  22. Official website of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation // http://economy.gov.ru/minec/activity/sections/instdev/institute/

References

  1. Federal law “About Investment Activities in the Russian Federation Which Is Carried Out in the form of Capital Investments” from 2/25/1999 No. 39-FZ.
  2. Vinograj O.M., Abramov S.A., Konakova S.V. Regional investment policy and investment activity of the region //Competitiveness. Innovations. Finance. 2011. No. 2. – page 7-10.
  3. Vodop'janova N.A. Influence of the state investment policy on efficiency of social and economic system: the abstract of the thesis for a degree of Candidate of Economic Sciences / the Volgograd state university. Volgograd, 2008. – 23 pages.
  4. Gorlov A.V. The mechanism of implementation of investment policy on the basis of assessment of potential of investment attractiveness of the region (on the example of the Amur region) //the Russian economic online magazine. 2009. No. 2. – page 247-253.
  5. Igoshin N.V. Investments. Organization of management and financing. – M: UNITY-DANA, 2002. – 112 pages.
  6. Krugljakova V.M. Regional investment policy: teoretic-methodological bases, methodical and tool providing. Abstract yew. Dr.Econ.Sci. Voronezh. 2013. – 40 pages.
  7. Ksenofontov V.I., Zajkov V.P. Experience of formation of standard legal support of regional investment policy //Problem of modern economy (Novosibirsk). 2010. No. 1-1. – page 201-206.
  8. Mal'cagova T.M. The principles and methods of financing of investment process at the regional level / Ivanovsky the state chemical and technological university. Ivanovo, 2011. – 18 pages.
  9. Mahotaeva M. Ju. Formation of investment policy at the regional level: monograph. - Pskov: Pskov state university, 2015. – 224 pages.
  10. Nikolaev M.A., Mahotaeva M.Ju., Naumova E.N. Methodological aspects of formation of regional investment policy //Bulletin of the Pskov state university, 2015, No. 1. – page 83-91
  11. Novokshonova E.N. Assessment of efficiency of regional investment policy //Regional economy: theory and practice, 2014, No. 11. – page 49-60
  12. Osipov P.Ju. Investment climate of regions as object of influence of regional investment policy //Bulletin of the Tambov university. Series: Humanities. 2008. No. 8 (64). – page 412-416.
  13. Petrov A.V. Investment policy of the region: orientation to innovations //Creative economy. 2012. No. 7. – page 54-59.
  14. Podmolodina I.M., Avcinov O.I. Increase in investment attractiveness of the region: experience of the Voronezh region //Bulletin of Voronezh State University of engineering technologies. 2014. No. 4 (62). – page 226-230.
  15. Pshikanokova N.I. Regional investment policy: institutional and economic mechanism of strategic management //Messenger of the Adygei state university. 2005. No. 4. – page 35-65.
  16. Rajzberg B.A. Dictionary of the modern economic terms / Rajzberg B.A., Lozovskij L.Sh., etc. M.: Ayres Press, 2009. – 476 pages.
  17. Risin I.E., Khariton S.V. Regional investment policy: contents, principles of development and implementation //http://www.lerc.ru/?art=4&page=12&part=bulletin
  18. Savon I.V. The systems concept to control of investment processes at the regional level //Financial researches. 2012. No. 1. – page 128-132.
  19. Factors of sustainable development of regions of Russia: the monograph // G.R. Gibadatava, T.S. Grin'ko, A.A. Davydova, etc. / Under a general edition of S.S. Chernov. – Book 16. – Novosibirsk: TsRNS publishing house, 2014. – 283 pages.
  20. Hodus V.V. Entity and main dominants of a regional investment policy //Messenger of SAMGUPS No. 1 (11), 2011. – page 111-116
  21. Shvakov E.E. The investment mechanism in the territories of regional development //News of the Altai state university, 2014. No. 2-1. – page 313-316
  22. Official site of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation//http://economy.gov.ru/minec/activity/sections/instdev/institute/

Investments

GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND PRINCIPLES FOR FORMING REGIONAL INVESTMENT POLICY

M.I. Samogorodskaya,

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor Voronezh State Technical University

Among the complex and current problems, the solution of which is associated with the processes of stabilization of the domestic economy and its subsequent sustainable development, it is worth highlighting the formation of an effective regional investment policy. The relevance of solving this problem is due to the decentralization and regionalization of the Russian economy, increasing its openness and intensive inclusion in the system of world economic relations. These processes in the context of globalization are accompanied, along with industry, by fierce territorial competition for advantageous positions in the system of both the all-Russian and international division of labor, as well as for the investment resources necessary for the implementation of accelerated adaptation of regions to market conditions management. In the conditions of transition from the unitary type government structure From Russia to a federal one, the role of the subjects of the Federation is radically changing. Each region, each subject of the Federation strives to create the most attractive investment climate, Better conditions for investment activities. There is a growing understanding in the regions that an effective regional investment policy can play an important role in solving a number of pressing economic and social problems.

However, an analysis of the practice of developing regional investment policies indicates that such a process has a number of disadvantages: it is reduced mainly to operational decisions authorities at all levels, not focused on the future; does not provide full-fledged education

the specifics and competitive advantages of the territories; is not systemic in nature. This is largely due to the lack of conceptual work that defines the features and nature of the formation of regional investment strategy and policy.

After all, politics not only expresses common interests, but also consolidates different interests. Therefore, any policy is only as good as it manages to maintain a balance of different interests. Regional investment policy is no exception. And it is effective to the extent that a compromise is reached between the regional interests of the state and the local interests of the regions themselves. The unifying principle of state and regional investment policy is sustainability, stability of inter- and intraregional relations.

Regional investment policy, developed and implemented by the regions themselves, is a set of actions carried out for coordinated investment development in a specific territory, taking into account local conditions. The state investment policy is designed to ensure the viability of regional investment policy on the ground. However, it would be wrong to limit state investment interests only to this. The truth about the partial discrepancy between national and regional interests does not require proof. If we proceed from the unconditional priority of regional investment policy, this will lead to a violation of national

investment interests, the implementation of which in the long term should be of interest to the majority of constituent entities of the Russian Federation. In other words, when developing regional investment policy, the priority of national interests must be respected. Trends towards strengthening the economic independence of regions, improving the use of their investment potential, and more fully taking into account their specific interests should not lead to the isolation of regions. The proportions and resources of the economy of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation are such that the effectiveness of investments largely depends on the functioning of rational interregional connections. Therefore, the most important principle of regional investment policy can be considered the interaction of integration and independence of regions in a single economic space.

Only with this approach can a real basis be created for the establishment of a clear and consistent state investment policy that recognizes both the general ideology of consent and the presence of specific interests of the state and regions. The subject of state investment policy can be considered the coordination of the interests of the state and regions in the course of solving regional investment problems. That is, the subjects of the Federation must necessarily participate in determining the objectives of state investment policy and methods of its implementation.

There is no generally accepted definition of regional investment policy today. This is not accidental, since the very concept of “politics” is multifaceted and multivariate; many approaches to it are possible. Any policy is a set of ways to achieve goals and objectives pursued and solved by people in connection with their specific interests, as well as methods, means and institutions with the help of which these interests are formulated, defended and defended. From this methodological statement it follows: regional investment policy can be considered only such a system of intentions and actions that realizes the internal interests of the regions themselves and the investment interests of the state in relation to the regions using methods and means that take into account the nature of modern regional investment processes, and which implements all this mainly in the structure inter- and intraregional

connections. Moreover, the regional investment policy will be the more active, the more clearly it identifies the actual regional interests, ways and methods of their implementation; true subjects of regional investment relations.

Thus, regional investment policy (RIP) is a set of principles, methods and measures of government bodies and administrations of constituent entities of the Russian Federation to regulate the investment process, as well as a mechanism for their implementation, aimed at stimulating investment activity and creating a favorable investment climate in the region. The essence of RIP is to make maximum use of favorable investment opportunities and factors in the interests of the whole society and minimize the negative impact of investment risks on the socio-economic situation of a particular region.

It should be noted that RIP today is in a certain legal vacuum and chaos, since adopted laws, directives and decrees related to federal assistance, the fiscal system, often contradict each other, are more intended to resolve critical situations than to carry out RIP as consistent and logical system. Although gradually the contours of the regulatory and legal framework of investment policy are manifested in various laws, agreements on the delimitation of jurisdiction between government bodies of the Russian Federation and government bodies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, the Federative Treaty (to the extent that does not contradict the Constitution of the Russian Federation), etc.

RIP is developed and implemented through the interaction of government authorities at the federal and territorial levels, as well as local governments. Carrying out your own investment policy at the regional level is a necessary condition and an integral part of the implementation of regional socio-economic policy in order to achieve the effective functioning of the socio-economic system of both the country as a whole and the regions. The global goals of the RIP correspond to the goals of the general regional policy, namely: creating the most optimal living conditions for the population, achieving territorial justice in their living conditions. At that

At the same time, RIP appears where there are any problems in accordance with which investment tasks are solved: ensuring the investment attractiveness of the region, smoothing out territorial imbalances, redistributing resources between regions, stimulating various types economic activity, optimization of the territorial structure of society, solving various kinds of social problems, etc. The choice of specific RIP priorities should be determined, first of all, by the characteristics and needs of the regions. Consequently, the development of investment policy in the region contains both general principles of its formation and the need to take into account the specifics of individual territories due to the high differentiation of the socio-economic situation of the regions.

The need for the formation of RIP is due to the need to mobilize (concentrate) the region’s limited investment resources, as well as to attract additional investments (from public and private, domestic and foreign structures) to solve acute interterritorial problems of development of the region as a whole, as well as to ensure the effective use of existing and attracted resources in progress in the implementation of priority investment projects.

To implement the investment policy and intensify the investment process in the region, a number of prerequisites are necessary:

Regional legislation that stimulates investment in the region;

Activities to strengthen investor confidence and establish long-term partnerships with them;

Reasonable economic strategy regional development;

The presence of a regional investment program, formed on a competitive basis, based on the development programs of cities and regions;

Availability of control over the targeted use of public funds and cost-effectiveness analysis;

Availability of warranty regional fund;

Development of an investment insurance system, audit and examination of investment projects;

Availability of the necessary infrastructure for investment activities, scientific-innovative and information-marketing

a base capable of ensuring scientifically based development, effective implementation and subsequent monitoring of RIP; effectively current system management of socio-economic development of the region.

The general goal of RIP, in our opinion, is to create conditions for the influx effective investments into the regional economy; effective investment support for the process of comprehensive interterritorial development of the region. Effective investments usually mean those investments that, in addition to paying for the risk of investments, make it possible to obtain an economic benefit acceptable for the investor and for the region receiving the investment in the form of, for example, profit from investments. In this regard, the main criterion for the investor will be the expected return on invested capital in comparison with the degree of risk, and for the region - an increase budget efficiency regional economy. An increase in the region's budgetary efficiency is a positive change in the regional budget balance. That is, investments should lead to either an increase in income or a decrease in regional budget expenditures.

The general goal, in turn, defines a set of RIP subgoals:

development of the main directions of joint investment activities based on the selected priorities for the development of the region; formation of a regional investment program in the form of a set of large-scale investment projects and determination of its investment capacity; study of the existing investment potential and the possibilities of its mobilization for investment and resource support for the regional investment program; determination of the main directions and mechanisms for mobilizing existing and attracting additional investment resources for the implementation of the regional investment program.

In addition, goals related to: a primary focus on the implementation of large-scale long-term projects can be adopted as subgoals; with the elimination of irrational duplication of investment projects and shifting the center of gravity of competition for investments from intraregional to interregional

regional plane by using the competitive advantages of the region.

In practice, RIP is implemented as a consistent solution to specific long-term, medium- and short-term problems. Long-term objectives include:

Development of a regional regulatory framework aimed at improving the investment climate in the region, increasing the overall investment attractiveness of the region, reducing investment risks (including improving mechanisms related to the protection of investor rights);

Increasing the region's investment resources through budgetary and extra-budgetary sources at all levels of government, financial resources of private capital (including foreign), as well as savings of the population;

Creation of an efficiently operating infrastructure of the regional investment market;

Improving depreciation policy: legislative prohibition of using the depreciation fund for other purposes; development and lobbying at the federal level for the practical application of various accelerated depreciation schemes;

Formation of a healthy competitive environment; promoting the creation and effective development in the region of various forms of intra-industry and inter-industry organization of producers ( regional associations, corporations, unions, financial industrial groups, etc.);

Concentrating the region's investment resources on the development of priority sectors of the economy and solving the most pressing problems social development; formation of a register of priority industries and territories;

Expansion of effective demand, including demand for products of regional enterprises and demand for investment resources;

Search for objects and areas acceptable from the point of view of efficiency for investment; formation of new sources of tax and rent payments, etc.

These tasks and ways of their implementation are largely determined by the general economic and socio-political situation in the country. Solving a significant part of the problems associated with the medium- and long-term prospects for increasing investment activity in the region will

hanging from improvement federal legislation in the field of investment and entrepreneurship: development of a unified federal law on investment; development and adoption of regulations aimed at introducing various schemes for accelerating depreciation, etc.

Short-term investment tasks solved at the regional level change as the situation in the region and in the country as a whole changes. The most typical tasks solved by regional authorities include:

1) creation at the regional level of an infrastructure for settlements between subjects of the regional investment market, including testing of various means of payment;

2) saturating the needs of the real sector of the regional economy with liquid working capital, including through the issuance of corporate securities, regional securities, bill circulation;

3) mobilization of external resources for enterprises in the region financial sources;

4) creation of conditions that ensure an increase in internal sources of investment resources of enterprises - depreciation and profit;

5) creation of reliable channels for investing raised capital;

6) strengthening control by regional authorities over the targeted use of funds from the regional budget allocated for investment;

7) regulated distribution of preferential investments for individual projects, economic sectors and territories;

8) inclusion into economic circulation of resources available in the region, including rights to use natural resources, real estate, scientific and technical potential of the region, etc.

The practical implementation of the previously stated strategic and tactical objectives in the presence of formulated prerequisites is obviously possible if the RIP is built on the following principles:

Purposefulness, that is, the focus of the RIP on the implementation of the system of goals and objectives of the general socio-economic policy of the region;

Priorities for solving the most pressing problems of socio-economic development of the region;

Balancing the interests of all potential participants in the investment process (public and private interests, mixed public-private financing of highly effective projects);

Equal rights for investors when receiving government support and unification of public procedures; openness and transparency of the procedures for the formation and implementation mechanisms of the RIP;

Openness and accessibility of information for all investors;

Clarity and simplicity of procedures for formalizing relations between the investor and the authorities; mutual responsibility of authorities and investors; immutability decisions made;

Balancing the maximum use of the opportunities and advantages of the regional administration as a business entity;

The investment orientation of the budget policy, subject to the condition of reasonable sufficiency in other areas of expenditure;

Flexibility, based on the need to take into account changes in the investment environment and providing a mechanism for quickly adapting RIP to new conditions while strictly observing the interests of the subjects of the investment process;

Objectivity and priority economic efficiency in the decisions made. When forming investment policy in the region, the following must be taken into account: the features of the regional investment strategy; RIP time frame and financial capabilities of the regional budget; the possibility of obtaining objective information for the direct formation of RIP; the presence of a professional team capable of developing the RIP and its further implementation and management; features of the regional investment climate, industrial policy, export opportunities, living standards of the region's population; factors of the region’s investment potential necessary for the practical implementation of the RIP; available production capacities of enterprises in the region and their possible expansion based on integration; volumetric and cost parameters of production, social and economic factors of RIP.

The formation and implementation of investment policy in the region is a complex multi-stage problem, each stage of which requires separate study and constant adaptation to the changing conditions of the functioning of the regional investment system. The process of formation and implementation of RIP can be represented in the form of three interrelated and interdependent stages.

Stage 1. Formation of the RIP concept consists of solving a set of the following tasks:

creation of a regional coordination council for investments, consisting of representatives of regional authorities and commercial structures for the formation and subsequent coordination of the process of implementing the RIP, as well as the distribution of tasks among council members;

creation of regional specialized organizations to promote investments in the region and implement RIP (for example, such as a fund or agency for promoting foreign investment under the regional administration);

determination of regional investment priorities (social, environmental, industrial, commercial, etc.);

assessment of the investment opportunities of enterprises in the region and the extent to which they use their production capacities, investment opportunities of the regional budget;

analysis of the existing regional legislative and regulatory framework in the field of investment, strengths and weaknesses, opportunities and risks of the regional economy;

preparation and adoption by the highest legislative body of the region of the RIP concept.

The main provisions of the RIP concept, adopted by the highest regional legislative body, are:

goals of subjects of the regional investment market;

RIP priorities;

criteria for selecting regional investment projects and including them in programs that will be supported by the regional administration, and possibly partially financed from the budget;

the scale of investment policy and possible real sources of its financing;

elements of regional investment infrastructure necessary for the implementation of the RIP;

tasks of intensifying international investment cooperation, creating positive

a strong image of the region as a reliable consumer of investment resources;

the place of investment policy of the regional administration in the implementation of regional socio-economic policy.

It should be noted that at the stage of developing the RIP concept, the quality and reliability of the prepared information is more important than at subsequent stages. This is explained by the fact that further development of RIP is associated with the involvement of significant financial investments, and the time spent studying strategic markets, partners and programs, territorial, technical and technological, managerial, organizational and financial factors in order to find the optimal solution pays off many times over at the RIP implementation stage.

In general, the RIP concept is a pre-program document on the basis of which the corresponding regional investment program, which includes a system of short-, medium- and long-term measures and mechanisms for their implementation.

Stage 2. Development of /*///7 includes a wide range of consulting, expert, financial and design work. The main tasks to be solved at this stage boil down to the following: development and adoption of the organizational, legal, technological, information base of the RIP;

preparation and analysis of alternative RIP options and preliminary selection of the most effective one in accordance with the requirements formed in the initial version of the RIP concept;

performing preliminary technical and economic calculations of the effectiveness of alternative RIP options;

direct development of a program of activities that form the basis of the RIP;

detailed study of the RIP by the companies that form the basis of the regional investment advisory council;

definition strategic partners, authorized companies, banks and firms that will participate in the process of implementing the RIP;

development of the RIP project, transferring it for initial examination to consulting, expert organizations, regional governing bodies, federal specialized organizations;

assessment of the nature and extent of the impact of RIP activities on environment, social and demographic situation in the region;

development of technologies, methods and ways of cooperation with foreign investors; identifying the main sources of investment and ways to attract investment;

study financial opportunities region for financing RIP and identifying main (budgetary) and additional sources of financing;

optimization of the scale of RIP in accordance with the volume of possible financing;

formation of the final version of the draft RIP for submission to the regional legislative authorities for consideration;

making additions and changes in accordance with the comments of the authorities and final approval of the RIP with its transfer for execution.

Stage 3. Implementation of the RIP consists of solving the following tasks:

final selection of contractors for the implementation of RIP and conclusion of contracts with them;

drawing up calendar schedules for the implementation of RIP activities and their optimization;

direct implementation of RIP activities;

financial management of RIP; control and analysis of actual execution of RIP;

assessing the effectiveness of RIP implementation; prompt introduction of corrective changes and impacts;

preparation of a new next version of the RIP for the next period.

Assessing the effectiveness of investment policy in the region is a tool for regulating the regional investment process. The effectiveness of RIP should be understood as the ratio of the results of its implementation (implementation) and the costs associated with their achievement.

The main results of the RIP include quantitative and qualitative incremental socio-economic characteristics determined by the achievement of the goals and objectives of the RIP:

1) increase in the number of employees (increase in the number of jobs);

2) expansion of the tax base (increase in the number of business entities);

3) increasing the investment potential of the region (attracting additional domestic

national and foreign investment resources);

4) improvement of the environmental situation;

5) improving the quality of service to the population, etc.

Total costs include budgetary allocations at all levels, as well as funds raised from domestic and foreign legal entities and individuals.

It is advisable to evaluate the effectiveness of RIP using a system of general and specific indicators, among which are:

The socio-economic effect from the implementation of RIP, defined as the difference between the increase in gross regional product and total investment investments in the regional economy, multiplied by the investment efficiency standard adopted in the region;

RIP profitability, determined by the ratio of the total result of the implementation of the RIP to the total costs associated with this implementation (for example, the ratio of the increase in gross regional product to the total investment investments in the regional economy for the period of implementation of the RIP);

Coverage ratio of budgetary allocations due to direct and indirect budget revenues(additional tax revenues from the creation of new jobs and the opening of new industries; budget savings associated with the payment of unemployment benefits, costs of training and retraining of personnel and other costs that would have to be incurred in the event of non-implementation of a specific RIP measure).

Assessing the effectiveness of the RIP is an important element of the system for monitoring the implementation of the RIP. The latter provides for making adjustments to the main directions of the RIP in order to take into account the situation emerging during the development of the regional investment process (the emergence of new projects, changes in the implementation of existing ones, etc.).

It seems to us that the assessment of the effectiveness of the implementation of regional investment policy should be carried out not just according to a number of economic indicators, but according to a very specific management technology. Consequently, today there is an objective need to develop appropriate methodological provisions, which should become an important component of improving the scientific and methodological support of the regional investment process.

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

1. Leksin V., Andreeva E., Sitnikov A., Shvetsov A. Regional policy of Russia: Concepts, problems, solutions // Russian Economic Journal. 1993. No. 9.

2. On the concept of regional policy // Economist. 1995. No. 4.

3. Regional investments // 1Шр:// www.invest.delovoy.com/rus/academy/ri/.

4. Samgorodskaya M.I. Investment management: Monograph / Ed. B.G. Preobrazhensky. Voronezh. 2002.

5. Strategy for sustainable growth of the region’s investment attractiveness (coordinated support for investments) // http://www.tacis-Bupe^y. copy pe1;Das15.pYt1? Barm=1 &Op-=pPo1:.

Rvf (■ rm iro V S5M And in ouchterkto uchegv in banks

Foreign experience

Educational programs « >■

Expert consultations

The educational center

International accounting

Recruits students for training groups in the practice of preparing financial statements based on international standards.

Classes are taught by an accredited teacher of the International Association of Accountants.

Upon completion of training, students take an exam to obtain a certificate from the International Association of Accountants.

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.

Posted on http://www.allbest.ru/

Course work

Regional investment policy

Completed:

4th year student

Gusev P.M.

Introduction

regional investment policy

The study of economic investment problems has always been the focus of economic science. This is due to the fact that in modern economic conditions, which are characterized by increased competition, the process of investment activity is becoming increasingly important, ensuring increased competitiveness of individual regions and the entire economy as a whole. Currently, they are the most important means of ensuring conditions for overcoming the current economic crisis, structural changes in the national economy, ensuring technical progress, and improving the quality indicators of economic activity at the micro and macro levels. The gradual formation of a promising investment policy in the region, the creation of a structure of market institutions that adequately meets the requirements of a market economy, which would meet the needs of all economic entities, is one of the most effective mechanisms of socio-economic transformations.

One of the conditions for the sustainable development of Russian regions and increasing the rate of economic growth is to increase the validity of economic, organizational, regulatory, financial and credit decisions taken at the regional level and aimed at developing a promising investment policy in the region.

The existing mechanism for making long-term investment decisions and forming a long-term investment policy in the region is currently characterized by a lack of consistency, which does not allow local, regional and federal economic management bodies to effectively use available investment resources, to ensure an increase in the investment attractiveness of individual regions and the entire national economy of Russia as a whole. , which negatively affects the pace of economic development of the national economic system.

The relevance of solving the problems of forming a promising investment policy in the region posed in the course work, creating conditions for increasing investment activity, interaction between various participants in the investment process is increasing in modern conditions and determines the need to create an effective mechanism for forming a promising investment policy through economic, regulatory, financial, organizational , social and other impacts from federal and regional authorities.

The object of the study is investment policy in the region.

The subject of the study is ways to improve the implementation of investment policy in the Nizhny Novgorod region.

The following methods were used during the study:

Study and analysis of scientific literature;

Comparison;

The purpose of the course work is to explore ways to improve the implementation of regional investment policy. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to solve the following main tasks:

Study the theoretical aspects of the development of investment activity;

Analyze ways to implement investment policy in the Nizhny Novgorod region;

Identify the main directions for improving the implementation of regional investment policy in the Nizhny Novgorod region.

When writing the work, the information and empirical base was used: legislative acts and government regulations; statistical data; scientific literature; methodological literature.

Chapter I. Theoretical foundations for the implementation of regional investment policy

1.1 Problems of formation of regional investment policy

Regulation of economic relations between the federal center and the regions has become one of the most acute and pressing problems of the Russian economy. This convincingly shows the constant reproduction of disagreements between the center and the regions on the distribution of income and deficits between them when adopting the federal budget.

Investment is a flow of investments of funds diverted from direct consumption for a specific purpose.

Investment policy is an integral part of the overall financial strategy, which consists of selecting and implementing the most rational ways to expand and renew economic potential. Regional investment policy should be understood as a system of measures and a mechanism for their implementation aimed at stimulating investment activity and creating a favorable investment climate in the region.

Investments are made in various forms, and for accounting, analysis and planning they are classified according to individual characteristics.

Firstly, according to the objects of investment of funds, real and financial investments are distinguished.

Real investments - aimed mainly at maintaining and developing material production and the service sector, include: capital investments, investments in the acquisition of land, etc. including working capital costs.

Financial - investing funds to purchase values ​​of the stock and money markets (stocks, bonds).

Secondly, according to the nature of participation in investment, as well as within the framework of foreign investment, direct and indirect investments are usually distinguished.

Direct - involve the direct participation of the investor in choosing an object for investment.

Indirect - carried out through financial intermediaries - commercial banks, investment companies. Portfolio investments are also distinguished - investments in stocks, bonds and other securities associated directly with the title of the owner, which gives the right to receive income from the property.

Thirdly, according to the investment period, investments are divided into short-term (for up to 1 year) and long-term (over 1 year).

Fourthly - by form of ownership:

Private investment expresses the investment of funds in the objects of entrepreneurial activity of legal entities, as well as citizens.

State - characterize the investment of capital of state unitary and municipal enterprises, as well as funds from the federal and regional budgets and extra-budgetary funds.

Fifthly, on a regional basis they are divided into investments within the country and abroad. Bocharov V.V. Investment management. S-P.2009.p.5

Equally important is the concept of investment climate, which includes the objective capabilities of a country or region (investment potential) and the conditions for an investor’s activity (investment risk).

It is clear why it is not enough to consider only potential or only risks to make decisions. A region may be first-class in terms of potential - for example, it has raw materials or a wealthy population - but if the political situation is unstable or the environment is so polluted that the population simply cannot stand another plant, for example, then few will dare to invest. And vice versa, the region may be quiet and calm, but there is simply nothing for an investor to do there.

Investment potential (investment capacity of a territory) is the sum of objective prerequisites for investment, depending both on the presence and diversity of areas and investment objects, and on their economic “health.” The potential of a country or region is basically a quantitative characteristic, taking into account the main macroeconomic indicators, the saturation of the territory with production factors (natural resources, labor, fixed assets, infrastructure, etc.), consumer demand of the population, etc.

Investment risk characterizes the probability of loss of investments and income from them. It shows why you should not (or should) invest in a given business, industry, region or country. Risk sums up the rules of the game in the investment market. Unlike investment potential, many of these rules can change overnight - just as a person's mood and opinion change. Therefore, in essence, risk is a qualitative characteristic. The degree of investment risk depends on political, social, economic, environmental, and criminal situations.

Classification of investment forms and types, clear formulation of tasks and goals, allows authorities and enterprises to more effectively manage investment flows both in the region and beyond.

In the field of investment, there is a progressive weakening of the position of the federal center, which is expressed in a systematic decrease in the share of funds from the federal budget in the total volume of investments in the country.

Before 2000, the dynamics of investment in fixed capital were unfavorable in the vast majority of Russian regions.

There is an extremely strong differentiation in the dynamics of investment in fixed capital in individual subjects of the federation.

Even more obvious than in previous periods was the trend of worsening investment dynamics as the country moved from the West to the East.

Moscow is the undisputed, absolute leader among the regions of the Russian Federation in terms of the volume of accumulated foreign investment, it accounts for slightly less than half of the total volume of foreign investment accumulated in Russia since the beginning of reforms, including 33.94% (almost a third) of the total volume of direct investment as of September 2001.

A number of regions, namely St. Petersburg, the Moscow region, the Republic of Tatarstan, the Tyumen and Sakhalin regions, the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug and the Krasnodar Territory, are also leaders among other regions of the Russian Federation in attracting foreign investment.

About 10 regions, namely the Arkhangelsk region, the Komi Republic, Nizhny Novgorod, Belgorod, Samara, Omsk, Irkutsk regions, Krasnoyarsk and Primorsky Territories, have accumulated foreign investment in the amount of 280-480 million dollars. USA or from 1 to 1.7% each of the total volume of foreign investments made in Russia during the years of reforms. And finally, in more than 30 regions, the volume of accumulated foreign investment did not exceed 30-45 million US dollars (or no more than 0.1-0.16% in each of these regions of the total volume of foreign investment in Russia), which gives grounds to conclude that there is almost complete absence of influence of the foreign investment factor on the economy of these regions. Information on attracting foreign investment into the regional economy: the current situation and the main directions of state policy. 2010. p. 18

I would like to note that there is a belief in society that the main tool for shaping investment policy is tax regulation. And therefore, the most attractive are those regions where taxes are lower and benefits for investors are greater. This is why, many believe, investors prefer the Leningrad and Novgorod regions to other regions of the North-West.

From this point of view, the fiscal policy pursued by the federal center in recent years, which increasingly reduces the ability of regional authorities to regulate taxes, undermines the foundations of investment policy. Particularly strong changes have occurred in recent years: since 2002, the constituent entities of the Federation have been deprived of the right to reduce their part of the rate (16.5%) of the income tax by more than 4%, and since 2003, tobacco excise taxes will go entirely to the federal budget. The situation with the distribution of attracted investments across regions requires serious analysis and corresponding immediate actions on the part of legislative and executive authorities at both the federal and regional levels.

Practice shows that regional investment policy in the context of the emergence of a market environment is at the stage of formation from the point of view of the economic mechanism for its implementation. In addition, its organizational side is not fully debugged. In other words, many regions are not ready to conduct investment policies in market conditions. And one of the reasons for this situation is, unfortunately, the insufficient experience and qualifications of regional authorities in implementing investment policy.

During the period of the Soviet Union, regional investment policy was carried out by the union center. Moreover, the former union republics were not economically independent entities. It was the center that decided which republics and regions required additional financial resources. Over 90% of government capital investments were made from the union budget. Another feature of the regional investment policy pursued by the Union center was the predominantly subject (sectoral) specialization of the regional economy according to the type: Ural - metal, heavy equipment, Eastern Siberia - timber, Kuzbass - coal, Tyumen - oil and gas, etc.

Since investments serve as one of the main factors in increasing economic efficiency, in the context of a decline in production, the issue of finding a quantitative increase and qualitative improvement in investment projects has become particularly important. Analyzing the dynamics of the main indicators of the economy over the past few years, it is easy to conclude that the areas of investment processes are low and limited.

A characteristic feature of the Russian market is a noticeable differentiation of investment activity in individual sectors of the economy. A similar situation is observed at the regional level.

The key problem of investment policy for almost all regions has become the search for sources of financing. Theoretically, there are quite a few potential options for attracting capital to regional investment projects. However, at present, only a few are able to play a significant role in the investment process. Despite the fact that in most regions of the Russian Federation the budget situation remains very tense, perhaps one of the most realistic sources of financing is the own funds of regional budgets.

The experience of recent years has shown that one cannot count on financial support for regional investment projects from the federal budget. A number of regions actively invested their own funds in the development of the regional economy. Let me note that we are talking, first of all, about large financial centers, as well as about territories where industry has a pronounced export orientation. These are the cities of Moscow, St. Petersburg, Krasnoyarsk, Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) and others. Rating of investment attractiveness of Russian regions http://www.raexpert.ru/Expert/Regions10-11/data/region.htm

Another, more or less stable source of investment in the regions is capital investment from enterprises’ own funds through the accumulation of financial resources in specialized funds, equity participation, guarantee mechanisms, etc.

If we talk about large-scale sources of financing capital investments in the regions, then first of all we can name direct and private foreign investments. However, it should be noted that the influx of foreign investment into the regional economy has sharply decreased in recent years. This is due to a number of reasons. Imperfect economic legislation, high levels of taxation, high political risks, lack of a system of guaranteeing and insuring foreign investments, weak protection of the personality and property of investors - this is not a complete list of reasons for the reluctance of foreign investors to invest their financial resources in the development of the Russian economy and the regional economy in particular.

World practice shows that in developed countries in recent years, leasing has become increasingly important as one of the progressive forms of attracting and using investments. A leasing company is essentially a financial intermediary that attracts resources to purchase equipment, update the fixed capital of enterprises, expand production volumes, carry out technological modernization, etc.

However, leasing relations with Russian enterprises are developing extremely slowly. Vinokurov N.A., Sukhodolov A.P. “Economy of the Nizhny Novgorod Region”, Nizhny Novgorod, - 2009. The lack of interest in this form of attracting investment is explained by the fact that, along with problems of accessibility and the cost of financial resources, as well as problems of solvency, it is of no small importance that the majority of managers and financial directors of Russian enterprises have a rather superficial understanding of the conditions and advantages of industrial financial leasing.

When forming the RIP, Indrisov A.B. Investment policy in the territory of the municipality should be taken into account. M. 2010. p.50:

Characteristics of the strategic socio-economic orientation of the region;

Investment policy framework and its financial capabilities;

Availability of natural, demographic, production financial resources;

Features of the regional investment climate, industrial policy, export opportunities, living standards of the region's population:

Availability of a professional team capable of developing an investment policy and its further implementation and management;

Possible relationships between industry projects and other industries, both regional and federal;

Future demand for certain consumer goods, the consumption of which may increase due to increases in population or purchasing power, or the expected demand for newly created goods.

An analysis of scientific publications on the problem of forming investment policy allows us to formulate a number of main directions for its implementation at the regional level: the formation of a favorable investment climate; searching for sources of financing for structural reforms; increasing the role of enterprises’ own sources of financing investment projects; strengthening control by regional authorities over the targeted use of funds from the regional budget allocated for investment; reduction of investment risks, etc.

Of no small importance is the implementation of an investment policy taking into account specific conditions, as well as the desire of regions to use their comparative advantages to attract both domestic and foreign investors.

The use of the above tools will not only create a favorable investment climate, but also implement investment policy, which should be aimed both at finding the most effective sources of financing, and at supporting enterprises and maximizing the use of production, natural and scientific potential. Sapegina O.P. Problems of formation of RIP.”Region: economics and sociology” No. 2, 2010. p.29

1.2 Principles and instruments of regional investment policy

Regional investment policy implies the development and strict adherence to key investment principles, these include the following:

Strengthening state and municipal control over the targeted expenditure of budget funds allocated for investments in the form of non-repayable financing and lending;

Consistent decentralization of investment processes based on the development of diverse forms of ownership;

State support for enterprises operating within the framework of RIP, with a gradual shift in the center of gravity from non-repayable financing to lending on a repayable and paid basis;

Placement of limited centralized capital investments and state financing of investment projects exclusively on a competitive basis;

Priority use of an increasing portion of investment funds for the implementation of effective and quick-payback investment projects and small business facilities, regardless of the form of ownership;

Expanding the practice of joint financing of investment projects by both government and commercial structures of the region and other countries;

Conversion of debts into property in the absence of a method of mutual settlement agreed upon by the partners, etc. Indrisov A.B. Investment policy in the territory of the municipality. M. 2010. p.63

The principles listed above cannot be called general principles for RIP; they sound differently in different sources. The development of principles depends, for example, on the development model of the regional economy; the following principles can be identified:

Actively promoting the equalization of investment potential, creating equal competitive conditions for attracting investment resources and, on this basis, reviving investment processes in the regions;

Expanding the independence of regions in choosing directions and investment objects, taking into account local needs;

Development of regional investment legislation and regulatory framework in the field of business support;

Effective use of limited budget investments,

Providing guarantees, both economic and political;

Formation of information openness of the region;

Creation of a specialized market infrastructure that supports the investment process.

The implementation of these tasks and principles requires improvement of the legal, financial and economic foundations and organizational tools for investment interaction between the center and the regions. Certificate on attracting foreign investment in the regional economy: current situation and main directions of state policy. 2010. p.24

Economic policy must be uniform. Ensuring the unity of the economic space on the territory of the Russian Federation by suppressing and preventing its fragmentation by establishing administrative barriers (bans and restrictions on both the export and import of goods, excessive licensing, etc.). Individual regions should compete with each other only with benefits within the limits of their regional legislation.

There are a number of economic and administrative regulators or tools to attract investors to the region, on the basis of which RIP is based: 1) preferential treatment or tax breaks - are a more common way for investors to stimulate investment. The purpose of this policy is to attract investment while awaiting the expiration of tax incentives. In most cases, tax breaks include a temporary reduction or elimination of the income tax paid to the region. The size and timing of tax abolition vary greatly depending on the region; 2) state guarantees, which make it possible to attract funds to investment projects from the open resource market, without resorting to large-scale financing from the budgets of the subjects. Guarantees against non-commercial risks, unhindered transfer of dividends and repatriation of capital by foreign investors from the region are also provided; 3) competitive selection of projects for inclusion in the region’s investment programs and ensuring their participation in federal target programs; 3) infrastructure has a significant impact on the efficiency of private investment, so its provision is a means of attracting investors to the region. The ability to use buildings and land (the right of disposal, which often belongs to regional or municipal administrations) is also a significant determining factor for attracting foreign investment; 4) investment from the budgets of the constituent entities of the federation.

It is also advisable to create a system for informing potential investors, including foreign ones, about the regions’ policies to attract investment. The participation of federal authorities in providing investors with information about the regions could become one of the factors in increasing the investment attractiveness of individual regions, a mechanism for encouraging regions seeking to create “transparent” legislation favorable for economic development. It is possible that the well-known nature of regions with favorable legislation (of course, if such legislation exists) will become an incentive to attract investment to them.

Whether or not the investment policy in the region will have a structural investment character depends on the direction set by this economic regulator in the regulatory and legislative acts on investment activities. Tyaglov S.G. Kuznetsova N.G. Regional economics. Rostov-on-Don. 2011. p.139 I note that at the regional level, the constituent entities of the Russian Federation largely copy the measures taken by the federal authorities.

1.3 Features of regulation of regional investment policy

In addition to the instruments and principles of RIP, there are investment projects implemented in the region that regulate investment activities. These projects can be divided into the following three groups:

1. Projects supported and partially financed by the regional administration due to their social, environmental or other socially beneficial nature. This category includes projects related to the creation of regional infrastructure, including road construction, the development of communications and small-scale energy, the creation of modern market infrastructure, including the infrastructure of the regional investment market. Projects associated with the creation of a significant number of new jobs may also fall into this category if we are talking about depressed regions.

2. Projects supported by the regional administration, but financed only from other sources due to economic efficiency and, therefore, profitability for a potential investor. This category includes projects related to the development of new technologies and the release of new competitive types of products, as well as projects related to the involvement of material resources and the scientific and technical potential of the region into economic circulation.

3. Projects that are not supported by the regional administration, but are being implemented due to their exceptional profitability. This category includes projects, the implementation of which may lead to deterioration of the environmental situation in the region, as well as projects to organize the production of products that are in demand by the population, but are not recognized as useful (for example, the tobacco industry). Here it is necessary to take into account alternative options for meeting the demand for such products and choose the most appropriate one specifically for the region.

Consideration of alternative investment options and alternative options for developing the situation in the region should be considered as a key point in determining priorities and regulating investment policy. Depending on the attractiveness or, conversely, the attractiveness of alternative options for the development of the situation, it is possible to reconsider the attitude towards certain specific investment projects and the system of priorities as a whole. Indrisov A.B Investment policy on the territory of the municipality. M. 2010. p.48

The main provisions of regional investment activities adopted by the highest regional legislative body are:

Goals of participants in the regional investment market;

Priorities of the regional investment program;

Formation of criteria for the selection of regional investment projects and programs that will be supported by the regional administration, and possibly partially financed from the budget;

Determining the scale of the investment program and possible real sources of its financing;

The main development paths and elements of regional investment infrastructure necessary for creation and support, including state ones;

The place of the investment policy of the regional administration in the implementation of regional socio-economic policy;

The tasks of intensifying international cooperation, creating a positive image of the region as a reliable consumer of investment resources.

The process of regulating investment activities includes the formation of the regulatory and legal framework for RIP. Creation and development of a system of regulatory and legal support for RIP, reflection in the legislative and regulatory acts of the regional administration of the interests of RIP subjects and investment interests of the region. This allows the transformation of a region into a territory:

Favorable for the development of investment activities, the creation of investment institutions;

With a positive international image as a reliable and large consumer of investments, where the interests of a foreign investor are protected; The administration supports the investor and has a developed professional investment infrastructure, uses all progressive investment instruments, and cooperates with reliable investment institutions.

Financial and credit support for RIP. This support should combine the optimal implementation of tax benefits in the region; carrying out a balanced depreciation policy; a system of grants for the development of a system of regional investment institutions; direct budget financing of RIP activities, projects and programs; creation of regional investment funds, insurance, leasing, consulting companies, etc.

Information support for RIP is considered important, which is based on:

Professional information support for entrepreneurship and industrialists in the region through specialized information and analytical centers that have and maintain the relevance of investment information;

Implementation of measures to widely disseminate investment knowledge and investment information through federal, regional and international media, including electronic ones;

Creation of a special comprehensive program within the framework of the RIP, which will ensure openness of information in the region, its investment market, and contribute to the creation of a unified regional investment space.

Some sources touch upon such aspects of regulation as methodological and staffing of RIP, as well as safety issues.

All of the above listed features of regulation of investment policy in the region are decided in each specific case in relation to the characteristics of the subject.

Chapter II. Regional investment policy of the Nizhny Novgorod region

2.1 Investment attractiveness of the Nizhny Novgorod region

The investment climate of the Nizhny Novgorod region is one of the most comfortable in Russia. Regional investment legislation, which is recognized by experts as one of the most successful in the country, a powerful system of financial and non-financial benefits provided to business, as well as organizational support for investments, allow investors to effectively realize the region’s significant economic and resource potential of manufacturing industries and the innovation sector. The favorable geographical location and high capacity of the consumer market create good opportunities for the development of transport and logistics.

The Nizhny Novgorod region is one of the most attractive for the development of investment activity due to a number of integral, historically established competitive advantages:

The strategic location in the center of the European part of Russia, 400 km from Moscow, at the intersection of the international transport corridors “North-South”, which begins in Finland and extends to India, and “West-East”, connecting European countries and the Far East, determined the role of the region as a “crossroads of Russia”.

The Nizhny Novgorod region is the center of the greatest consumer demand in Russia. About 43 million people live within a radius of 500 km, and about 84 million people live within a radius of 1000 kilometers, which exceeds the similar figures for Moscow and St. Petersburg.

The Nizhny Novgorod region is one of the most important industrial centers of the Russian Federation. Thanks to its powerful production base (deep industrial traditions, highly qualified specialists, the presence of strategic enterprises for Russia in the region), the Nizhny Novgorod region occupies a leading position in terms of industrial production volumes. The basis of the region's industry is transport (aircraft, auto, ship) engineering, metallurgy, petrochemicals, and the defense industry.

The legislation of the Nizhny Novgorod region, which occupies one of the first places in Russia according to ratings, fully meets the interests of the investor. If an investment project is assigned priority status, the investor receives the maximum benefits allowed in the Russian Federation.

The Law “On State Support of Investment Activities on the Territory of the Nizhny Novgorod Region” defines the legal basis for investment activities on the territory of the Nizhny Novgorod Region, establishes forms of state support for investment activities, and the procedure for its provision by state authorities of the Nizhny Novgorod Region.

For the first time in Russian legislative practice, the law of the Nizhny Novgorod region on state support for investment activities formulates the very concept of state support and legislatively establishes preferential conditions for carrying out investment activities in the region.

The Law “On the Regulation of Land Relations in the Nizhny Novgorod Region” defines the powers of state authorities and local self-government bodies of municipalities in the region to dispose of land plots before the delimitation of state ownership of land in the territory of the Nizhny Novgorod Region.

In the region, an investment infrastructure has been developed and clearly functions in the interests of investors. The Ministry of Investment Policy of the Nizhny Novgorod Region organizes work with investors in a “one window” mode. This regime assumes that the ministry, having received an investor’s application containing initial information on the required land plot and engineering support, prepares the necessary documents for a preliminary assessment of the project (approximate investment agreement, conclusion on the socio-economic significance and budgetary efficiency of the project).

The Investment Council under the Governor of the Nizhny Novgorod Region reviews projects presented by the Ministry of Investment Policy. Upon approval of the project by the Investment Council, the ministry, together with the approving, supervising and controlling bodies and other authorized structural divisions of the Government of the Nizhny Novgorod Region, provides the investor with the documents necessary to begin the implementation of the investment project and provides comprehensive support throughout the entire period of implementation of the investment project.

An effective and transparent procedure for completing an investment application, operating on the “one-window” principle, allowing a business to receive a land plot for the implementation of an investment project within 104 days with preliminary approval of the location of the facility, or within 142 days without such approval (with bidding).

Each investor who has decided to work in the Nizhny Novgorod region and has a business project receives methodological and organizational support related to the allocation of land and the launch of the project, primarily with the formation of a package of documents for the start of design work. Particular attention is paid to projects that have social and economic effects, implemented in priority sectors, that is, projects that will further ensure the growth of the economy of the Nizhny Novgorod region. Such projects can count on full support, we are talking about the most complete organizational, information and consulting support from the authorities.

Investors whose projects are assigned the status of a priority investment project in the Nizhny Novgorod region additionally receive financial and non-financial support. In addition, they are subject to the principle of “non-deterioration” of the legislative conditions of investment activity for the period of validity of the investment agreement.

Forms of financial state support for priority investment projects:

Tax benefits. The validity period of tax benefits provided to investors implementing priority investment projects in the Nizhny Novgorod region is limited by the payback period of the investment project and is no more than five years from the date determined by the investment agreement, and this day is determined by the investor himself (after all, benefits are needed when the implementation of the project has already begun) , but not earlier than the entry into force of the law of the Nizhny Novgorod region approving the agreement.

Income tax benefits. The reduction in the rate of income tax to be credited to the consolidated budget of the Nizhny Novgorod region depends on the share of revenue received from the implementation of the priority investment project of the Nizhny Novgorod region, in the total revenue of the company ranging from 1 to 4%.

Property tax benefits. The property of organizations created, acquired or used for the implementation of a priority investment project according to the quarterly list approved by the Ministry of Investment Policy of the Nizhny Novgorod Region is not subject to taxation.

An investment tax credit can be granted for a period of one to five years. For regional taxes, the validity of the investment tax credit can be extended by decision of the Regional Government, but not more than for 5 years. Interest charged for using an investment tax credit is set at a rate of no less than one-half and no more than three-quarters of the refinancing rate of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.

State guarantees of the Nizhny Novgorod region. On a competitive basis, investors implementing a priority project may be provided with state guarantees of the Nizhny Novgorod region as a full or partial obligation of the investor to repay borrowed funds. The guarantee period cannot exceed five years, and the fee for its provision is 2% of the amount of the guarantee received.

Partial compensation to investors for interest rates on loans attracted for the implementation of investment projects. This financial support is quite popular and in demand among investors. Reimbursement from the regional budget of part of the cost of paying interest for the use of bank loans is carried out on the terms stipulated by the investment agreement and the loan agreement between the bank and the investor, subject to strictly targeted use of credit resources for the implementation of a priority investment project in the Nizhny Novgorod region and is carried out by transferring budget funds to the investor in the amount of 1/2 of the amount of interest accrued in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement, but not more than 1/2 of the amount of interest accrued at the discount rate of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, effective on the date of crediting credit resources to the loan account of the subject of investment activity.

The government of the Nizhny Novgorod region also provides for the following non-financial measures of state support for investments:

· support (direction) of petitions and appeals to the federal government bodies of the Russian Federation to provide assistance to investors in the implementation of an investment project;

· dissemination of positive information about the investor;

· assistance in creating business infrastructure.

The effectiveness of investment policy in the Nizhny Novgorod region can be judged by specific figures. At the end of 2008, the volume of investments in fixed capital of the Nizhny Novgorod region amounted to 195.6 billion rubles. (USD 5.8 billion), which allowed the physical volume index to reach 120.5% of the corresponding level of the previous year. As part of the new system for working with investors, from February 2006, from the beginning of the Investment Council, to January 1, 2009, 108 meetings were held, 1953 investment projects were approved, 54 of which received the status of a priority project in the Nizhny Novgorod region. This is more than 1.2 trillion. rub. ($35.8 billion) investment and 147,832 new jobs. The volume of foreign investments received in the non-financial sector of the economy of the Nizhny Novgorod region in 2008 amounted to 708.5 million US dollars (173.0% of the 2006 level).

2.2 Analysis of factors in the regional investment climate of the Nizhny Novgorod region

The investment climate is the environment in which investment processes take place. It is formed under the influence of an interconnected complex of geographical, climatic, economic, social, scientific, legislative, regulatory and other factors that determine conditions, etc. Investment climate assessments range widely from favorable to unfavorable. A favorable climate is considered to be conducive to the active activity of investors and stimulates the influx of capital. An unfavorable climate increases risk for investors, leading to capital flight and dampening investment activity. Let's consider the investment climate of the Nizhny Novgorod region based on some factors Lebedev V.M. Formation of the investment climate in Russia / Finance - 1995. - No. 4. P. 15, which form a favorable regional investment climate.

According to the objective geographical factor, the Nizhny Novgorod region is:

the capital of the Volga Federal District (the center of the European part of Russia);

the intersection point of the international transport corridors north-south" and the Eurocorridor MTC No. 2 (distance from Nizhny Novgorod to Moscow - 439 km);

area - 76.6 thousand km2 (0.4% of the territory of Russia);

population density - 44.1 people. per km2;

borders on the Ryazan, Vladimir, Ivanovo, Kostroma, Kirov regions, Mari, Mordovian and Chuvash republics;

rivers - Volga, Oka, Sura, Vetluga.

The region has developed transport infrastructure:

1300 km of railway tracks (network density 3 times higher than the Russian average);

more than 12 thousand km of roads (the density is 2 times higher than the average in the Russian Federation);

river ports and more than 900 km. waterways;

international Airport.

Analysis of the main socio-economic indicators Management of innovative development of the region: Ed. A.P. Egorshina. - N.Novgorod: NIMB, 2008. P.223 of the region in recent years (Table 1) has shown that it is developing steadily according to the subjective socio-economic factor.

The most significant factor determining the level of socio-economic development of the region is the development of industrial sectors.

From 2000 to 2008, the share of industry in the structure of GRP of the Nizhny Novgorod region grew and amounted to about 40.3% in 2008, where the main types of economic activity were: manufacturing; wholesale and retail trade; repair of vehicles, motorcycles, household products and personal items; real estate transactions, rental and provision of services; transport and communications. The Nizhny Novgorod economy, like the economy of Russia and most countries of the world, in 2009 was affected by the global financial crisis of 2008. From 2000 to 2009. the index of industrial production decreased by 14.6% by type of activity in 2009: “Mining” - 73.3%, “Manufacturing” - 76.9, “Production and distribution of electricity, gas and water” - 95, 6%. Product profitability on average for 2000-2008. increased by 9.9%, and in certain industries reaches 23.4% (metallurgy). In terms of the volume of shipped goods of its own production, work and services performed on its own in the extraction of mineral resources, the region ranks 62nd in Russia (in the federal district - 10), in manufacturing - 6 (1), in the production and distribution of electricity, gas and water - 19 (7). The region accounts for 64.0% of the all-Russian production of buses, 55.2 - trucks, 3.0 - passenger cars, 54.3 - thermoplastic sheets, 34.7 - vehicles for municipal utilities, 20.7 - steel pipes , 14.9 - polymer films, 11.6 - food concentrates, 7.3 - primary oil refining.

The labor resources of the Nizhny Novgorod region, its individual cities and municipalities, together constitute one of the richest territorial units in Russia. The economically active population in 2009 was 1,824 thousand people, which is 2.4% in Russia and 11.4% in the Volga Federal District, and the level of economic activity of the region's population was 69.3%.

Population (end of year estimate), thousand people

GRP, million rub.

Average monthly salary, rub.

Average per capita cash income of the population on average per month, rub.

Number of enterprises and organizations

Average annual number of people employed in the economy, thousand. people

Balanced financial result (profit minus loss) of organizations' activities, million. rub.

Investments in fixed assets, million rubles.

Number of students in higher educational institutions (at the beginning of the academic year), thousand people.

The largest employment of the population is provided by the following activities: wholesale and retail trade - 355.7 thousand people; manufacturing - 346.6; construction - 159.7; operations with real estate, rental and provision of services - 159.6; education - 133.0.

Educational and innovation infrastructure. The Nizhny Novgorod region is the Russian center of automotive manufacturing, aircraft manufacturing, shipbuilding, instrument making, nuclear physics, defense industry and other high-tech sectors of the economy. The developed scientific complex is represented by 100 scientific, educational, and research organizations. Today the region ranks 3rd in Russia in terms of the number of people employed in R&D. More than 42 thousand personnel are engaged in research and development. In 2009, the total number of researchers with an academic degree was 2221 people. of which 1902 are candidates of science and 564 doctors of science.

One of the leading educational centers in Russia, including 7 state universities (5 universities, 6 academies, 6 institutes), 8 branches of non-resident and Nizhny Novgorod universities.

In terms of legislative and regulatory factors, the Nizhny Novgorod region is one of the leaders among the regions of the Russian Federation. Over the past few years, an investment legislative framework has been created that has absorbed all the best from the experience of Russian regions.

In the region, the investment activities of business entities are carried out in accordance with federal legislation, as well as in accordance with the laws and regulations adopted by local governments, and constituting regional investment legislation, which consists of the following regulations: Law of the Nizhny Novgorod Region of June 22, 2000 No. 116 -3 “On state support for investment activities in the Nizhny Novgorod region”; Law of the Nizhny Novgorod Region of November 15, 2002 No. 67-3 “On a single tax on imputed income for certain types of activities”; regulations on the procedure for leasing state non-residential facilities, approved by Decree of the Government of the Nizhny Novgorod Region dated July 2, 2002 No. 152; methodology for determining rent for the use of non-residential state property facilities in the Nizhny Novgorod Region, approved by Decree of the Government of the Nizhny Novgorod Region dated June 20, 2002 No. 137; Regulations on the Council for Scientific, Technical and Innovation Policy, approved by Order of the Government of the Nizhny Novgorod Region dated June 17, 2002 No. 307-r.

Favorable geographical location, developed infrastructure, open friendly policy of the regional authorities largely contribute to the formation of a favorable investment climate and increasing the investment attractiveness of economic activity in the Nizhny Novgorod region.

2.3 Implementation of investment projects of foreign companies in the Nizhny Novgorod region: successes and problems

The main competitive advantages of the Nizhny Novgorod region are: favorable geographical location, human capital, location of federal research centers in the region, strong educational base, relatively low level of wages even by Russian standards. The Nizhny Novgorod region, unlike many regions of Russia, has a developed transport system, represented by various modes of transport: land, air, water. Considering the high density and population of the Nizhny Novgorod region, as well as neighboring regions, this territory is one of the most capacious and concentrated centers of consumer demand in Russia.

The investment climate of the Nizhny Novgorod region is one of the most comfortable in Russia. Regional investment legislation, which is recognized by experts as one of the most effective in Russia, a powerful system of financial and non-financial benefits provided to business, as well as organizational support for investments, allow investors to effectively realize the region’s significant economic and resource potential of manufacturing industries and the innovation sector. In order to quickly make decisions, ensure interdepartmental interaction, and also reduce the bureaucratic burden on investors, special structures were created that became the organizational basis of investment policy. In 2005, a special Ministry of Investment Policy (MIP) was created. The main task of the SIE is to develop and implement a unified investment policy for the Nizhny Novgorod region, determine priority areas of investment, and the conditions for their implementation. It is the SIP that ensures the collection of approvals in relation to a particular investment project declared by the investor for implementation, and takes upon itself most of the administrative and bureaucratic procedures, as well as resolving issues that arise at the start of an investment project, freeing investors from “walking along the corridors.” It is assumed that when launching a project, it is enough for a business to contact only this ministry from all government bodies. In 2006, an investment council was created under the Governor of the Nizhny Novgorod Region (IC), which includes heads of structural divisions of the Government of the Nizhny Novgorod Region, heads of territorial and federal government bodies, heads of large municipalities, and heads of leading enterprises in the region. The rules of work of the investment council allow, in an open discussion mode, based on previously collected conclusions, to quickly make decisions on projects announced for implementation. Meetings are held at least twice a month. As of 02/12/2010, the total volume of investments in projects approved at 142 meetings of the investment council will amount to 1,401.9 billion rubles, and it is planned to create almost 167 thousand new jobs. Investors have been issued more than 1 thousand complete sets of permits. 55 investment projects have been given the status of a priority investment project in the Nizhny Novgorod region, which implies that investors receive tax benefits in accordance with the Law of the Nizhny Novgorod region dated 31. 12.2004 No. 180-Z "On state support for investment activities in the Nizhny Novgorod region."

Similar documents

    Basic concepts, problems and directions of state regional policy of the Russian Federation, priorities and principles on which it is based. Features of the regional policy of the Novosibirsk region, further prospects for its development.

    course work, added 09/07/2010

    Political and legal foundations of the relationship between the center and the regions. Analysis of the problems of federal districts in the implementation of a new regional policy, the legislative framework for the implementation of regional policy, regional policy in the Siberian Federal District.

    course work, added 11/09/2013

    Main stages, aspects and directions of state regional policy in the Russian Federation. Socio-economic and political development in Kuzbass and Tomsk region. The effectiveness of state regional policy and ways to improve it.

    thesis, added 06/24/2009

    Management of state and municipal finances at the regional and city levels. Analysis of problems of the investment policy system and ways to solve them. The main directions of budgetary and administrative reforms, the formation of an investment image.

    course work, added 11/09/2013

    Features of regional youth policy - special state measures aimed at creating favorable conditions for the development of the younger generation, at adapting this age social group to public and personal life.

    course work, added 04/01/2011

    The essence and principles of regional policy, features and legal framework for its implementation in Russia. Brief description and socio-economic situation of St. Petersburg, analysis and assessment, improvement of regional policy in it.

    course work, added 03/20/2017

    Problems of regional economic policy. Excessive budget expenditures on the central government, lack of financial support for local and regional development. Reasons for the imperfection of local self-government and ways to optimize its work.

    test, added 12/11/2009

    Theoretical and legal aspects of investment in the Russian Federation. Legal regulation of investment activities in the Russian Federation. Basic principles of investment policy of municipalities. Investment policy of a municipality using the example of the city of Pskov.

    course work, added 02/07/2009

    Basic principles of effective regional policy. Internal politics of the regions. Main tasks of regional scientific and technical policy. The direction of national policy in Russia. Geography of cooperation of the Republic of Tatarstan, foreign trade.

    test, added 12/18/2011

    Management of regional policy of the Krasnodar Territory, concepts, models and priorities. Comparative analysis of its methods and tools in the European Union and the Russian Federation. Problems and prospects for the development of regional policy in the Krasnodar Territory.

Share